Option C is correct
The justice may let the judge who is writing the main judgement if he agrees on all points but if he agrees with the judgement but differs on some point he can write a" concurring' judgement where he can express his disagreement on those certain points.
Question 3 (3.5 points) A Supreme Court justice who agrees with the Court's decision in a...
Question 16 (3.5 points) A Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the Court's decision in a case... a) will probably write the majority opinion. b) may decide to write a dissenting opinion in the case. c) may decide to write a concurring opinion in the case. d) will probably resign from the court in protest.
When a majority of the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court makes a decision and agree on both the result and the reason for the decision, they issue what type of opinion? a. opinion of the court; b. concurring opinion; c. per curiam opinion; d. dissenting opinion.
a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Couple” . Briefly summarize the case. b] Use as many specific concepts and contents from this course to develop your argument either in favor or against that Supreme Court ruling. c] Can you identify any direct and/or indirect violence associated with this conflict? Article: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to...
Question 26 (3.5 points) A case that works its way through a state court system can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court if... a) the President of the United States orders the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari. b) the Congress orders the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari. c) a state supreme court orders the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari. d) there is a question of federal constitutional law involved in...
istructions mber that you only have 60 minutes to complete this exam. Short answer questions are found at the end of the exam, so leave adequate time ack and forth between questions do NOT have enough time to look up every answer d luck Wald Question 13 3 pts The Okdahoma Supreme Court decides the case of Alpha Corp v. Beta Co. Of the 7 justices, 4 agree that Alpha should win: 3 think that Beta should win. Justice Jones,...
please help me answer these questions .thanks Translated to friend of the court, these document s are written by nonparty interest groups and organizations urging the Court to adopt a particular outcome and/or rationale. Appellate court records Appellate briefs Amicus curiae briefs Orders stion 26 True or False: Based on the first-generation studies following Miranda v. Arizona, it appears there were some declines in the clearance rates True False > a) Moving to another question will save this response Question...
0/2s Question 4 The holding of a court is which of the following: The holding of a case is the statement of the key facts and the legal issues The holding of the case is written by the defendants attorney and is a summary of the trial and its outcome The holding is the decision of the court. The holding is the part of the decision in which judges who don't agree with the trial judge get to submit other...
Question 23 (3.5 points) Which of the following is NOT an example of judicial review? a) The Supreme Court rules that a state law violates the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. b) The Supreme Court rules that a federal law violates the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. c) The Supreme Court rules that a federal law does not violate the Commerce Clause Constitution. d) The Supreme Court declines to hear a particular case.
Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint of the 6th Amendment to tie it back to the Ist! Amendment from last week. Look at the case summary and facts for Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70,127 S. Ct. 649 (2006) A defendant in a murder trial is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury if courtroom spectators wear buttons showing a picture of the deceased. Facts Matthew...
Problem 1. TheWhite House Tapes On March 1, 1974, a grand jury indicted seven former aides to U.S. President Richard Nixon for attempting to cover up White House involvement in a burglary of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate complex in Washington. On April 18, the judge in the case, John Sirica, issued a subpoena for tapes of President Nixon's conversations with the defendants. The President's attorney, James St. Clair, attempted to delay responding to the subpoena. The prosecutor,...