Question 93 (1 point)
When lawyers argue that one case is sufficiently similar to
another, prior one so that it should be ruled/decided upon by the
judge using the pattern of reasoning and ruling in the prior case
(and hence decided in a similar way), these lawyers are making what
are, in effect, analogical arguments.
Question 93 options:
True
False
Question 94 (1 point)
A theory that is internally consistent is free of…
Question 94 options:
External data
Complexity/Nuance
Content/Substance
Contradictions/Incoherence
Qualifications/Stipulations
Question 95 (1 point)
Marketing and advertising still sometimes persuades
intelligent and educated people.
Question 95 options:
True
False
Question 96 (1 point)
is the extent to which a theory fits the facts or data—the
phenomena, occurrences, or states of affairs—it is intended to
explain.
Question 96 options:
Adequacy to the Phenomena
Scope
Simplicity
Internal Consistency/Coherence
Conservatism