(a)
Answer: Let the hypotheis are:
Null Hypothesis: Each of the three methods of weight loss i.e. Diet, Exercise, Behaviour Modification doesn't differ significantly in results.
Alternaitve Hypothesis: Each of the three methods do not provide the same output in terms of weight loss.
The Summary Table and ANOVA table for the data is:
1.
Summary of Data | ||||
Treatments | ||||
Diet | exercise | behaviour Modification | Total | |
N | 8 | 6 | 9 | 23 |
∑X | 22 | 12 | 63 | 97 |
Mean | 2.75 | 2 | 7 | 4.217 |
∑X2 | 168 | 98 | 695 | 961 |
Std.Dev. | 3.9188 | 3.8471 | 5.6347 | 5.0087 |
2.
ANOVA TABLE | ||||
Source | SS | df | MSS | F-ratio |
Between-treatments | 116.413 | 2 | 58.2065 | F = 2.67309 |
Within-treatments | 435.5 | 20 | 21.775 | |
Total | 551.913 | 22 |
Hence, with an F-Ratio=2.67309 and p-value=0.093578. We do not have suficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and hence, it can be assumed that alll the three methods of weight loss are same in terms of output.
(b) Since, all the three methods of weight loss do not differ significantly in terms of output. Hence, there is no need of Tukey's HSD test.
16.13 Twenty-three overweight male volunteers are randomly assigned to three different treatment programs designed to produce...