Discuss the Milgram experiment and what it taught us about the evil that subjects are willing to commit when they believe they are responding to an authority figure
Milgram experiment
The Milgram experiment was an experiment on obedience to authority figures that have taken place there at Yale University during the year 1961 under the guidance of the psychologist Stanley Milgram. Through this experiment, he and his team measured the willingness of the participants in performing the instructions given by an authority figure. In the experiment, the participants were given the roles of "teachers" and "students" and they were told that they are on a memory test experiment. Stanley Milgram introduced an intimidating shock generator before the "teachers" having different shock levels such as slight shock, moderate shock, danger: severe shock, and a final option of XXX. The "teachers" were instructed by the authority to deliver shock and they thought that they were administering real shocks and the "students" pretended to be receiving a real shock. Many "teachers" used an increased shock level and the "students" pleaded to be released and the teachers did not release them. It is found that many of the teachers were extremely angry while administering shock on students and they were reluctant to resist the authority even if it harms others. By analyzing the results of the experiment Stanley Milgram said that it is not the kind of personality but the situation or authority determines the actions of individuals.
Lessons from the Milgram experiment
The following are the lessons from the experiment.
Please give Up-vote if you like the answer. Thank you.
Discuss the Milgram experiment and what it taught us about the evil that subjects are willing...
7. The Milgram experiment shows that: Arendt is right that average people will do evil when they believe they are not personally responsible People like to comply with authority Americans are more likely to comply with authority than other people Genocide is easy to start 8. The distinctive feature of Stanton's model of genocide is that: Language is instrumental in the production of the conditions necessary for genocide Genocides are understudied in social science Genocides occur mostly in countries with...
Discuss the positive and negative aspects of both Conformity (Asch experiment) and Obedience (Milgram Experiment) and provide at least one example each of when you engaged in them. Positive conformity Negative conformity Positive obedience Negative obedience.
Please help with questions 8, 9, and 10
7. The Milgram experiment shows that: Arendt is right that average people will do evil when they believe they are not personally responsible People like to comply with authority Americans are more likely to comply with authority than other people Genocide is easy to start 8. The distinctive feature of Stanton's model of genocide is that: Language is instrumental in the production of the conditions necessary for genocide Genocides are understudied in...
Discuss medications to treat asthma. What specifically should patients be taught about these medications to prevent adverse side effects?
Discuss medications to treat GERD. What specifically should patients be taught about these medications to prevent adverse side effects?
Discuss medications to treat seizures. What specifically should patients be taught about seizure medications to prevent adverse side effects?
Discuss medications to treat seizures. What specifically should patients be taught about seizure medications to prevent adverse side effects?
Explain what Trump's US-China Tariff and Trade Wars is about. Discuss the impact of Trump's US-China Tariff and Trade Wars on the two economies and on other economies throughout the world. Discuss how Trump's approach to trade has impacted globalization.
Discuss what you think the exit polls tell us about voters.
In Ross et al.’s (1976) experiment on conformity, subjects listened to two consecutive tones and were asked to judge which tone was longer. The subjects made these judgments alongside other ostensible subjects, who were actually confederates of the experimenter and not true subjects. The researchers manipulated the incentive structure that these other “subjects” (i.e., confederates) were thought to be operating under. In one condition, the true subjects thought that the other subjects were paid equal amounts if they accurately judged...