Question

A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone wrong in the manufacturing process, at most 7 chips each lot would be defective, but if something does go wrong, there could be far more defective chips. If something goes wrong with a given lot, they discard the entire lot. It would be prohibitively expensive to test every chip in every lot, so they want to make the decision of whether or not to discard a given lot on the basis of the number of defective chips in a simple random sample. They decide they can afford to test 100 chips from each lot. You are hired as their statistician.

There is a tradeoff between the cost of eroneously discarding a good lot, and the cost of warranty claims if a bad lot is sold. The next few problems refer to this scenario.

(Continues previous problem.) Suppose that whether or not a lot is good is random, that the long-run fraction of lots that are good is 95%, and that whether each lot is good is independent of whether any other lot or lots are good. Assume that the sample drawn from a lot is independent of whether the lot is good or bad. To simplify the problem even more, assume that good lots contain exactly 7 defective chips, and that bad lots contain exactly 20 defective chips.

Problem 15 (Continues previous problem.) The number of lots the manufacturer has to produce to get one good lot that is not r

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Problem : 15 )

You're right about geometric distribution.

The parameter of this distribution, theta, is the probability that a good lot isn't rejected by the test.

It is theta = P(Accept H0 | H0 is true) = 1- P(Reject H0 | H0 is true),

And you know that P(Reject H0 | H0 is true) is the type one error of the test.

If, as we take it .01 we have theta=1-.01=.99.

Problem : 16 )

The number of lots the manufacturer must make to get one good lot that is not rejected has a geometric

distribution with parameter theta=.99,

So the expected value of number of lots the manufacturer must make to get one good lot that is not rejected is:

1/theta=1/.99.

= 1.0101.

So the expected value = 1.0101.

Problem : 17)

With this test and this mix of good and bad lots, among the lots that pass the test, the long-run fraction of lots

That are actually bad is,

P(Accept H0 | H1 is true) = P(Reject H1 | H1 is true) = the type two error of the test.

Therefore,

With this test and this mix of good and bad lots, among the lots that pass the test, the long-run fraction of lots that are actually bad is type two error of the test.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone...

    A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone wrong in the manufacturing process, at most 7 chips each lot would be defective, but if something does go wrong, there could be far more defective chips. If something goes wrong with a given lot, they discard the entire lot. It would be prohibitively expensive to test every chip in every lot, so they want to make the decision of whether or not to...

  • For the preparation and standardization of NaOH with KHP im supposed to boil water for 1hr and 30 min to remove CO2

    For the preparation and standardization of NaOH with KHP im supposed to boil water for 1hr and 30 min to remove CO2....the problem is that if I don't boil it for that long and (30 min) b/c of not enough time but I put the water I boiled for 1/2 hr aproximately into a NaOH bottle with a CO2 absorber and stored it there for a few days. I would assume that I would have to boil the water again...but...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT