Solution:
1. Reduction in consumption of red meat by the catholics by 5 tons may not necessarily increase the consumption of the same by others. Main reason is there is no shortage of red meat, that reduction of its consumption by one part of consumers will be compensated for by the other part. So, if any non-catholic was not eating the meat already may as well choose not to consume it still.
Thus, the given statement is False.
2. With reduction in consumption of red meat, the demand curve shifts left. That reduces the price of red meat, making it relatively cheaper than other protien sources (and not expensive). Also, over the long term, at max the red meat price could get back to the initial one, keeping relative price same, but under no case will the relative price increase.
Thus, the given statement is False.
1. True or False. [2 questions] 1. An article in the Wall Street Journal on Friday...