Question

What are two things that must be established for a purchase to be deemed a necessity?...

  1. What are two things that must be established for a purchase to be deemed a necessity?
  2. Discuss: Is the law concerning the contractual capacity of intoxicated persons fair? A contract made by a person who is legally insane is void, even though it might have been made during a lucid moment. However, a contract made by a mentally ill or intoxicated person is prima facie valid. Under what circumstances can such contracts be repudiated by those persons?
  3. Why are certain contracts prohibited at law?
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1. Question. What are two things that must be established for a purchase to be deemed a necessity?

Answer: The two things that need to be established for a purchase to be deemed a necessity is an offer by the offeror and the acceptance of the offer by the offeree. This also forms the basic premise of a contract between two parties which are an offer, the acceptance, a consideration.

2. Question : Discuss: Is the law concerning the contractual capacity of intoxicated persons fair? A contract made by a person who is legally insane is void, even though it might have been made during a lucid moment. However, a contract made by a mentally ill or intoxicated person is prima facie valid. Under what circumstances can such contracts be repudiated by those persons?

3. Answer: Yes the law concerning the contractual capacity of an intoxicated person is fair because it can be used to take unfair advantage of the other person. Therefore the law has prohibited the capacity of an intoxicated person to enter into a contract. On the prima facia, it is valid because it might be possible that the other party was not aware of the fact that the person making the contract is not actually intoxicated or the intoxication was not enough that bar the person to enter into a legally valid contract. The two conditions that must be there in order to repudiated by those parties are:

4. A. The other party who is not intoxicated was aware that the first party has been intoxicated.

5. B. The level of intoxication or consumption of alcohol was enough that the person was not in a stable state of mind to make a valid contract.

6. Question: Why are certain contracts prohibited at law?

7. For example, contracts made by mentally ill, blind, or dumb persons are not valid.

8. Contracts made under the effect of intoxication or alcohol are not valid.

9. Contracts made by the minors are not valid.

The contract having unfair terms for either of the parties is void since the beginning.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
What are two things that must be established for a purchase to be deemed a necessity?...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 1. What was the court's decision in Lucy v. Zehmer? a. The claim made by Lucy...

    1. What was the court's decision in Lucy v. Zehmer? a. The claim made by Lucy was inconsistent with his attempt to testify in great detail as to what was said and what was done. b. The writing signed by the defendants did not constitute a binding contract of sale between the parties c. At no time prior to the execution of the contract had Zehmer indicated to Lucy by word or act that he was not in earnest about...

  • Business Law Questions I need help on, not sure if the first few are correct or...

    Business Law Questions I need help on, not sure if the first few are correct or not. It is more of a Business Law Questions These questions are either true or false. NAME True TRUE OR FALSE (2 Points Each) . In order to be legally valid, a contract must be in writing 2. A valid contract is one that meets all of the requirements of a enforceable contract. 3. An implied contract is formed by conduct nel 7 ....

  • 1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in...

    1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in cases having incompetent parties. B) It permits a court to order enforcement of a contract that lacks consideration. C) It allows for a party to claim goods that were never paid for. D) It is invoked in cases that involve a promissory note. 2. Which of the following is true for a minor under the infancy doctrine? A) A minor is bound to the...

  • Question 14 (2 points) Saved While having lunch at a Wendy's restaurant, Karin offers Sebastian her...

    Question 14 (2 points) Saved While having lunch at a Wendy's restaurant, Karin offers Sebastian her priceless original Gauguin painting for $1 because "Sebastian is a good friend and always has been there for her. Karin, a notoriously bad speller, writes the following short agreement on the back of a heavily used yellow paper napkin using multicolored crayons: "I, Karin Miller, herebeye sel to my bestest friend and solemate, Sebastian Jones, my original Goguin peinting (called Summer at the Beech)...

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

  • you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d...

    you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d 609 (1974) John SALSBURY, Appellee, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 55960. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1974. Laird, Burington, Bovard & Heiny, Mason City, and William F. McFarlin, Des Moines, for appellant. Boyd G. Hayes, Charles City, and William Pappas, Mason City, for appellee. Considered en banc. HARRIS, Justice. This is the third appeal in which we have considered a claim...

  • Classical Roman civil law was based on _____. Group of answer choices Procedural requirements Analysis of...

    Classical Roman civil law was based on _____. Group of answer choices Procedural requirements Analysis of the local tribunes A stock of concepts of legal significance Preferences of the individual judge Question 21 pts Informed consent specifically refers to a patient’s right of _____. Group of answer choices Free investigation Self-recognition Information gathering Self-determination Question 31 pts Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. focused on _____. Group of answer choices Medical malpractice Battery Products liability Judicial malfeasance Question 41 pts...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

  • Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are...

    Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT