Q-1) As ,
,
So total amount spend on these three stocks is
As the investor has only 40,000 to invest
So we must have
Option a. is correct
Q-2) Total number of shares possible is
Since its given that is at most 35% of the total so
Or
Thus, Option b. is correct
Q-3) As and at least 1000 is to be invested into it so . Also
Number of shares of stock 2 and 3 is at least 350 so
So we have the constraint as
and
Option a. is correct
In a Portfolio Selection problem, let X1, X2 and 3 represent the number of shares purchased...
In a Portfolio Selection problem, let X1, X2 and 3 represent the number of shares purchased for stocks 1, 2 and 3, which have selling prices of $45, $15 and $100 respectively. The returns on investment for stocks 1, 2 and 3 are 10%, 8%, and 13% of the amount of money invested respectively. The investor has up to $40,000 to invest. One appropriate constraint would be: Select one: O a. 45x1 + 15x2 + 100x3 s 40,000; O b....
In a portfolio problem, X1, X2, and X3 represent the number of shares purchased of stocks 1, 2, and 3, which have selling prices of $15, $47.25, and $110, respectively. The investor has up to $50,000 to invest 98) The stockbroker suggests limiting the investments so that no more than $10,000 is invested in stod 2 or the total number of shares of stocks 2 and 3 does not exceed 350, whichever is more restrictive. How would this be formulated...
Question 29 in a portfolio problem. X. X2, and Xz represent the number of shares purchased of stocks 1, 2 and 3 which have selling prices of $15, 547.25, and 5110 respectively. The investor has up to $50,000 to Invest The investor stipulates that stock 1 must not account for more than 35 of the number of shares purchased. Which constraint is correct?
Problem 2. This is adapted from our textbook. Let X -[x1,x2, x3,x4 be a set of four monetary prizes, where 0 < x1 < x2 < 13 < x4. Stowell claims he is an expected utility maximizer. He is observed to choose the lottery π-(1, 1, 1, ) over the lottery π,-(0Ί, , Ỉ ). Based 1 11 7 4 24 24) Based on that observation, can you conclude that he is truly an expected utility maximizer, as he [10...
Consider the following Linear Problem Minimize 2x1 + 2x2 equation (1) subject to: x1 + x2 >= 6 equation (2) x1 - 2x2 >= -18 equation (3) x1>= 0 equation (4) x2 >= 0 equation (5) 13. What is the feasible region for Constraint number 1, Please consider the Non-negativity constraints. 14. What is the feasible region for Constraint number 2, Please consider the Non-negativity constraints. 15. Illustrate (draw) contraint 1 and 2 in a same graph and find interception...
Problem 3: You have a portfolio of 5 stocks with equal shares invested in each stock. Variances of individual stock are the same and equal to ơ2-16. Covariances between stocks 1, 2, and 5 are equal to 2. Stocks 3 and 4 are uncorrelated with each other and are uncorrelated with stocks 1,2 and 5. a) Find the variance of this portfolio using "box" method. Further assume that stocks 1, 2, and 5 have beta's of1.1 each and stocks 3...
A linear programming problem has been formulated as follows: Maximize 20 X1 + 10 X2 Xy+ 2 X, s 100 2 X1 + X2 s 100 2 X1 + 2 X2 2 100 X120, X220 Which of the following represents the maximum value of the OF to this problem? Select one: O a. 950 O b. 1200 O c. 2000 O d. 1000 O e. 1350
3 -0.751 (X1,X2, X3) be jointly Gaussian with ux (1,-2,3) and Cx 1. Let X = 3 0.25 4 L-0.75 0.25 Hint: If a set of random variables (RVs) are jointly Gaussian, then any subset of those RVs are also jointly Gaussian. Similarly, adding constants to (or taking linear combinations of) jointly Gaussian RVs results in jointly Gaussian RVs. Using this property you can solve problem 1 without using integration. When appropriate, you may express your answer by saying that...
In the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), we are interested in the total time to complete a project that is comprised of a large number of subprojects. For illustration, let X1, X2, X3 be three independent random times for three subprojects. If these subprojects are in series (the first one must be completed before the second starts, etc.), then we are interested in the sum Y = X1 +X2+X3. If these are in parallel (can be worked on simultaneously),...
In the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), we are interested in the total time to complete a project that is comprised of a large number of subprojects. For illustration, let X1, X2, X3 be three independent random times for three subprojects. If these subprojects are in series (the first one must be completed before the second starts, etc.), then we are interested in the sum Y = X1 +X2+X3. If these are in parallel (can be worked on simultaneously),...