1. Computation of budgeted manufacturing rate for each department:
Given information
Machining department | Assembly department | |
Manufacturing overhead costs | $1,500,000 | $5,100,000 |
Direct manufacturing labor costs | $1,600,000 | $3,000,000 |
Direct manufacturing labor hours | 120,000 | 280,000 |
Machine hours | 30,000 | 270,000 |
Machine department overheads are allocated on the basis of actual machine hours and
Assembly department overheads are allocated on the basis of actual direct manufacturing labour costs.
Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate for Machining department = Manufacturing overhead costs / actual machine hours
= $1,500,000 / 30,000 hours = $50 per machine hour
Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate for Assembly department = Manufacturing overhead costs / actual direct manufacturing labour costs.
= $5,100,000 / $3,000,000 = $1.70
2. Computation of total manufacturing overhead costs allocated to Job 494:
Given information relating to Job 494
Machining department | Assembly department | |
Direct materials used | $42.000 | $78,000 |
Direct manufacturing labor costs | $15,000 | $19,000 |
Direct manufacturing labor hours | 1,100 | 1,300 |
Machine hours | 2,800 | 1,100 |
Machining department Manufacturing overhead cost allocated to Job 494 is
= Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate for Machining department x actual machine hours
= $50 x 2,800 hours = $140,000
Assembly department Manufacturing overhead cost allocated to Job 494 is
= Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate for Assembly department x Direct manufacturing labor cost
= $1.70 x $19,000 = $32,300
Total manufacturing overhead costs allocated to Job 494 = $140,000 + $32,300 = $172,300
3. Computation of over or under-allocated manufacturing overhead for each department:
Applied manufacturing overhead costs to Machining department = Actual machine hours x Budgeted overhead rate
= 33,000 hours x $50 per machine hour = $1,650,000
Applied manufacturing overhead costs to Assembly department = Actual direct manufacturing labour cost x Budgeted overhead labour rate
= $3,200,000 x $1.70 = $5,440,000
Machining department | Assembly department | |
A. Actual Manufacturing overhead costs | $1,800,000 | $5,300,000 |
B. Applied manufacturing overhead costs | $1,650,000 | $5,440,000 |
C. Over or (Under) allocation of manufacturing overhead (B - A) | ($150,000) | $140,000 |
Under-allocation of manufacturing overhead for Machining department by $150,000
Over-allocation of manufacturing overhead for Assembly department by $140,000.
Question 2(lob casting accounting for Marks) anufacturing overhead) 125 The Matthew Company uses a normal job-costing...
Question 2 (Job costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead rates) 25 Marks) The Matthew Company uses a normal job-costing system at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining department and an assembly department. Its job- costing system has two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual machine-hours, and the assembly department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual direct manufacturing labor costs). The...
4-25 Job cesting, accounting for manufacturing overhead, budgeted rates. The Matthew Company uses a normal job-costing system at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining department and an assem- bly department. Its job-costing system has two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufac- turing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual machine-hours, and the assembly department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual direct manufacturing labor costs). The 2017...
The Luke Company uses a normal job-costing systern at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining department and an asserbly department. Its job-costing system has two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual machine-hours, and the assembly department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual direct manufacturing labor costs). The 2017 budget for the plant is as follows: (Click the icon to...
The Lowell Company uses a normal job-costing system at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining department and an assembly department. Its job-costing system has two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual machine-hours, and the assembly department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual direct manufacturing labor costs). The 2017 budget for the plant is as follows: E (Click the icon...
The Lowell Company uses a normal job-costing system at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining department and an assembly department. Its job-costing system has two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor, and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department overhead allocated to jobs based on actual machine-hours, and the assembly department overhead, allocated to jobs based on actual direct manufacturing labor costs). The 2017 budget for the plant is as follows: (Click the icon to...
manufacturing overhead costs $3,660,000 Actual machine-hours 196,000 1. Calculate the budgeted manufacturing overhead rate. 2 Calculate the manufacturing overhead allocated during 2017 3. Calculate the amount of under-or overallocated manufacturing overhead. Why do Taylor's managers need to calculate this amount? 4-25 Job costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead, budgeted rates. The Matthew Company uses Seormal job-costing system at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining department and an assem- bly department. Its job-costing system has two direct-cost categories (direct materials...
1. Compute the (a) budgeted Y UNI What are the job costs of the Laguna Model and the Mission Model using (a) normal costing and Why might Atkinson Construction prefer normal costing over actual costing? 4-24 Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate, allocated manufacturing overhead. Taylor Company uses bosting. It allocates manufacturing overhead costs using a budgeted rate per machine-hour. The following data are available for 2017: Budgeted manufacturing overhead costs $3,800,000 Budgeted machine-hours 200,000 Actual manufacturing overhead costs $3,660,000 Actual machine-hours...
4-31 Job costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead, budgeted rates. The Fasano Company uses a job-costing system at its Dover, Delaware, plant. The plant has a machining department and a finishing department. Fasano uses normal costing with two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manu. facturing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department with machine. hours as the allocation base, and the finishing department with direct manufacturing labor costs as the allocation base). The 2011 budget for the...
i Requirements The Luke Company uses a normal job-costing system at its Minneapolis plant. The plant has a machining depan labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department overhead, allocated to jobs based costs). The 2017 budget for the plant is as follows: (Click the icon to view the budget data. Read the requirements, 1 J } J Direct Costs K Direct Materials L L Direct Manufacturing Labor 1. Identify the components of the overview diagram of Luke's...
Walker Enterprises, Inc., uses a job-order costing system and sets a predetermined overhead rate at the beginning of each year based on estimated manufacturing overhead costs. Each job requires work in both the Assembly and Machining Departments. The predetermined overhead rate is based on direct labor cost in Assembly Department and on machine hours in Machining Department. At the beginning of the year, the company made the following estimates: Assembly Department $120,000 Machining Department $32,000 Direct labor cost Manufacturing overhead...