International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are common accounting rules which define how a transaction should be reported. It also includes rules about the information to include or disclose on financial statements. It is a unitary set of standards that has helped to solve many problems in the accounting world for organizations, but this system has also been responsible for creating problematic outcomes as well.
Benefits of Adopting IFRS
1. It would create a single set of accounting standards
around the world.
Instead of using multiple accounting standards based on the
preference of each country where an organization does business,
adopting the International Financial Reporting Standards would
enable agencies from different segments of the globe to apply the
same standards in every transaction. The advantage to find here is
an increase in transparency, which would then allow for more
accessible cross-border investments. It would decrease the cost of
capital while providing higher liquidity during each
transaction.
2. It would reduce the time, effort, and expense of
preparing multiple reports.
The presence of International Financial Reporting Standards around
the world would allow organizations to cut down on the amount of
time they spend on preparing their financial statements. There
would be fewer costs associated with this work as well since there
would no longer be multiple standards and regulations to follow
based on where the company is doing business each year. Some
agencies would immediately reduce the number of reports they
produce from three to just one each year, saving them more time,
labor, and money since there is less work to do.
3. It would not be a costly transition in the United
States.
Although one of the disadvantages of adopting IFRS is the one-time
cost that would impact the economy, the actual expense of
transitioning to this global standard is minimal. The total cost
for the entire economy of the United States would be approximately
$8 billion, which means the average one-time cost to a
multinational company would be $3.25 million. Most agencies would
save a lot of money if they adopted International Financial
Reporting Standards because it would reduce the amount of work it
takes to remove errors, meet multiple regulations, and distribute
the information effectively. Over 100 countries so far have either
adopted or are in the process of adopting IFRS right now.
4. It would make it easier to monitor and control
subsidiaries from foreign countries.
Under the current system in the United States, agencies and their
subsidiaries must create parallel reports using GAAP and IFRS,
which means there is an increased risk of error and additional
auditing requirements necessary to ensure compliance. If the
International Financial Reporting Standards were to receive
adoption in the U.S., then it would eliminate the potential for
misunderstandings. It would help shareholders and firms to simplify
their investment decisions.
The U.S. has long been the world leader for taking a strong moral stand on financial ethics, with most nations following the same standard as the United States for generations. Now over half of the world is moving in the direction of IFRS, which means it should be strongly considered for implementation for American firms as well.
5. It would follow the same process that many American
agencies already follow.
Another benefit to consider with the adoption of IFRS is the fact
that many American-based companies doing business overseas are
already preparing reports based on this standard. They are
producing a simultaneous GAAP report to satisfy domestic
regulations while meeting the international rules. By adopting this
practice, the U.S. would help many large businesses to stop their
excessive work immediately, allowing them to focus on what they do
best. This advantage would allow U.S. businesses to be the driving
force in the establishment and adoption of international standards
once again.
6. It would offer more flexibility in the accounting
practices.
International Financial Reporting Standards use a principles-based
system instead of one that is based on a philosophy which follows
specific rules. That means the goal of each standard in IFRS is to
reach a reasonable valuation, and there can be several ways to
reach that outcome. This structure gives an agency the freedom it
needs to adapt the global system to fit their specific situations,
which eventually leads to the production of useful statements that
are much easier to read.
Challenges of Adopting IFRS
1. It would increase the cost of implementation for
small businesses.
Large businesses would absorb the cost of adopting the
International Financial Reporting Standards thanks to their need to
produce these reports outside of the U.S. already. Only small
businesses which provide local goods and services would receive the
brunt of this expense since they’d be forced to change as well.
Since there are fewer resources available for SMEs, it would take
them more time and effort to train their staff in this method. This
process means that it would be the sole proprietors, single-person
LLCs, and partnerships which would bear the brunt of this
accounting change.
2. It would lead to concerns with standards
manipulation.
The flexibility of IFRS can create numerous benefits, but it also
creates a disadvantage with this feature. Organizations can choose
to use only the methods that they wish to incorporate in their
reporting, allowing their financial statements to show the results
they desire. This structure makes it easier to incorporate profit
or revenue manipulation into the findings, making it easier to hide
financial problems that might exist. The International Financial
Reporting Standards can even lead to fraudulent activities, like
changing the method of inventory valuation to make more income come
into the profit and loss statement to make it seem like the company
is in a better position than it actually is.
3. It would require global consistency in auditing and
enforcement.
The enforcement of the International Financial Reporting Standards
can create some disadvantages as well. Although the United States
has an effective enforcement policy on its accounting rules, trying
to enforce this level of consistency on other member countries can
be challenging. The differences in political and economic systems
works to reduce the amount of comparability which is available,
even if it can improve the efficiency of audits or eliminate
information understanding.
4. It would increase the amount of work placed on
accountants.
The implementation of a new system of global accounting standards
would require a complete revision of the domestic accounting
processes and strategies. Although the CFO of each organization
would be responsible for this task under most circumstances, the
implementation of the new rules would come from the accounting
team. These departments are already busy trying to manage the rules
and regulations that are in place currently, so they would be asked
to continue with their daily work while creating the foundation for
this system to receive implementation too.
When you add in the additional training that many accountants would require to stay in compliance with the new rules, determining how continuing education programs would work is an issue that has little clarity at the moment.
5. It would create an adjustment period filled with
tumult.
When organizations begin to move from their current accounting
standards mandated by the country of origin to the global
accounting rules set by the International Financial Reporting
Standards, then there is an increased risk of suffering from a
costly delay or mistake during the transition period. Since every
country maintains their own complex systems of regulations that
govern financial reporting without direct involvement with the
standards in use, there might still be a requirement to offer
multiple reports as well. That means the only difference we see
when adopting IFRS globally is a shift in the presentation of what
the agencies provide.
6. It would require changes at the educational level as
well.
There are numerous business that would feel the financial impacts
of adopting IFRS immediately, even though the SEC estimates that
about 100 firms are already using this as their primary standard
since a majority of their revenue comes from overseas. We must also
adjust the curriculum offered at many business schools because the
International Financial Reporting Standards are not taught
regularly in the United States. Even though it would make
cross-border investments much more accessible, it would require a
grassroots movement to shift the educational perspective in
accounting to achieve many of the benefits listed above.
QUESTION 1 The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are playing an increasingly important role in global...
Question 1 The international financial reporting standards (IFRS) are playing an increasingly important role in global financial reporting. What are the benefits and challenges of adopting IFRS in Malaysia? Explain. (20 marks)
please make the answer long and more detail Question 1 The international financial reporting standards (IFRS) are playing an increasingly important role in global financial reporting. What are the benefits and challenges of adopting IFRS in Malaysia? Explain. (20 marks)
Question 1: Discuss how International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are developed? and the role played by AASB in that process? Question 2: It is argued by some researchers that even in the absence of regulation, organisations will have an incentive to provide credible information about their operations and performance to certain parties outside the organisation; otherwise, the costs of the organisation’s operations will rise. What is the basis of this belief? Please provide at least three reasons and/or theories to...
1. Discuss the international benefits of harmonization of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
What is the impact of some businesses using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) instead of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)? In your opinion, should there be a worldwide convergence of accounting standards? Why or why not? Explain.
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Under IFRS goodwill is tested _______ for impairment. (Fill in the blanks with time, like annually, etc.)
Which statement is NOT correct regarding International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)? a. IFRS is an accepted standard for public financial reporting in over 130 countries b. IFRS is an accepted standard for foreign companies filing with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission c. IFRS is an accepted standard for domestic companies filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission d. IFRS are principles-based while U.S. GAAP includes more detailed rules
1. International financial reporting interpretations (issued by the International Accounting Standards Board) Select one: a. Are considered authoritative and must be followed b, Cover issues where unsatisfactory or conflicting interpretations have developed c. Cover newly identified financial reporting issues not specifically addressed by the IASB d. All of the choices are correct regarding International financial reporting interpretations 2. The international financial reporting environment includes challenges in financial reporting including all of the following except: Select one: a. Political environment b....
ACC206: Financial Reporting MCQ 1. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) are; a. currently issued and administrated by the International Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee (IFRIC). b. currently issued and administrated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), an independent standard-setting board based in US. c. currently issued and administrated by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). d. currently issued and administrated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), an independent standard-setting board based in London. 2. Which ONE of the following...
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) does not use historical cost. As we discussed in Chapter 6, historical cost is the original monetary value of an item. For an example, if land was originally purchased one hundred years ago for $50,000, then that land would still be on the books for $50,000. Most importantly this cost is concrete and documented. Instead, IFRS revalues items at their current market value and the capital assets are marked up or down. What is the...