Question

Hello, 1. If an auditor is associated with an S-1 filed under the Securities Act of...

Hello,

1. If an auditor is associated with an S-1 filed under the Securities Act of 1933 and a lawsuit arises, what would the plaintiff need to prove?

2. What type of defenses are available to the auditor?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1) The plintiff must show

  • Economic loss
  • Auditors failed to exercise appropriate level of care
  • F/S contained a material misstatement
  • loss caused by reliance on misststed F/S

2)The defenses for the auditor include :

  • Lack of appropriate standing (relationship with the auditor) to bring suit
  • third party loss caused by factors otherthan theF/S and auditor's examination (causation defense)
  • Audit conducted as per GAAP(due diligence )
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Hello, 1. If an auditor is associated with an S-1 filed under the Securities Act of...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, in order to establish the liability of...

    Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, in order to establish the liability of an auditor who prepared a defective registration statement, a plaintiff must prove that: a. he/she purchased securities issued pursuant to the defective registration statement. b. the auditor acted with scienter in preparing the registration statement. c. the auditor was negligent in preparing the registration statement. d. he/she was in privity of contract with the auditor.

  • 22. The Securities Act of 1933

    22. The Securities Act of 1933(A) regulates trading in securities.B) approves and guarantees investments.C) regulates the initial issuance of securities.D) regulates the accounting profession.23. Which of the following statements about the Securities Act of 1933 is not true?A) The plaintiff must prove damages or an economic loss.B) The plaintiff must prove they read and relied upon the financial statements.C) Any purchaser of securities may sue auditors.D) The plaintiff need not prove that the materially misstated financial statements are the direct...

  • c. Which is the true statement conce O 1. The Securities Act of 1933 broadened the...

    c. Which is the true statement conce O 1. The Securities Act of 1933 broadened the auditor's liability relafive to common law and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 narrowed t O 2. Criminal liability only arises under state law O 3. The auditor may limit exposure to liability by destroying documents that might suggest an improper act O 4. The auditor has a greater burden of defense under the Securities Act of 1933 than the Securities Exchange Act of...

  • The plaintiff needs to prove causation to recover under the 1934 Act. True False 1 p...

    The plaintiff needs to prove causation to recover under the 1934 Act. True False 1 p QUESTION 9 Under the 1934 Act section 18, the auditor needs to prove a good faith effort was taken in the audit to avoid liability True False

  • Select the necessary words from the list of possibilities to complete the following statements.

    Select the necessary words from the list of possibilities to complete the following statements.Statements1. Under the Securities Act of 1933, initial purchasers of securities may sue the auditors for misleading audited financial statements and need not prove that they relied on the financial statements. The burden of proof is on the auditors to prove that they were in the performance of their work.2. When CPAs are associated with a possibility exists that the client may misinterpret the extent of the...

  • 1. Which of the following is false regarding common and federal securities laws? a. The securities...

    1. Which of the following is false regarding common and federal securities laws? a. The securities act of 1933 deals only with the reporting requirements for companies issuing new securities. b. -Rule 10-5b of the securities exchange act of 1934 is also known as the antifraud provision. C. -Ultramares doctrine states that ordinary negligence is insufficient for liability to third parties because of the lack of privity of contracts. d. A scienter is a specialist used in Rule 10-5b investigations....

  • Tinder the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable...

    Tinder the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable to clients and any person or limited foreseeable class of persons who the CPA knows will be relying on the CPA's work. (7) persons in privity of contract with the CPA and intended third parties. 13 clients and any third party that foreseeably relied on the accountant's report. (4) the client only. Yn di or DISCUSSION QUESTIONS AND PROI G.IZOBJECTIVES 5-3,5-4,5-5,5-6) Following are eight...

  • Legal Liabilities for CPA and auditors 1) the occurrence of events that result in losses for...

    Legal Liabilities for CPA and auditors 1) the occurrence of events that result in losses for users of the financial statements, (2) the investigation by plaintiff attorneys before filing, to link the user losses with allegations of material omissions or Page 342misstatements of financial statements, (3) the legal process, which commences with the filing of the lawsuit, and ( 4) the final resolution of the dispute. The first stage comes about as a result of some loss-generating event, including client...

  • 1. Which of the following is false regarding common and federal securities laws? a. The securities...

    1. Which of the following is false regarding common and federal securities laws? a. The securities act of 1933 deals only with the reporting requirements for companies issuing new securities. b. -Rule 10-5b of the securities exchange act of 1934 is also known as the antifraud provision. C. -Ultramares doctrine states that ordinary negligence is insufficient for liability to third parties because of the lack of privity of contracts. d. A scienter is a specialist used in Rule 10-5b investigations....

  • For each definition (or portion of a definition in the first column, select the term that...

    For each definition (or portion of a definition in the first column, select the term that most closely applies. Each term may be used only once or not at all. Term 1. Breach of contract 2. Common law 3. Constructive fraud 4. Defendant 5. Fraud 6. Joint and several liability 7. Negligence S. Ponzi scheme 9. Proportionate liability 10. Proximate cause 11. Scienter 12. Securities Act of 1933 13. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 14. Statutory law Partial (or Complete)...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT