Question

The Internal Revenue Code (legislated by Congress) is the highest tax authority in the country. The...

The Internal Revenue Code (legislated by Congress) is the highest tax authority in the country. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) enforces the tax laws. And if there is a disagreement between the taxpayer and the IRS, the matter may be litigated in court. Then you have tax professionals that represent taxpayers before the IRS. Tax professionals are bound by standards established by both the IRS and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). Two questions: Do you think there are enough protections and resources for the taxpayer when dealing with the IRS? What surprised you the most about the tax practice environment?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

The Internal Revenue Service(IRS) is a U.S. government agency responsible for the collection of taxes and enforcement of tax laws. Established in 1862 by President Abraham Lincoln, the agency operates under the authority of the United States Department of Treasury, and its primary purpose includes the collection of individual income taxes and employment taxes. The IRS also handles corporate, gift, excise, and estate taxes including mutual funds and dividends.

There are situations where a taxpayer can come into disagreement with the IRS. For this purpose, IRS created a separate branch of service called The Office of Appeals. Most of the employees here are auditors themselves, at one time, but are now senior employees in the IRS system, and they usually have legal or accounting experience. Their sole function is to review finished examination reports and provide an impartial platform for taxpayers to plead their cases to a higher power within the IRS. They attempt to avoid litigation by resolving tax disputes internally in a way that foments future voluntary taxpayer compliance with the tax laws.

From the point of view of taxpayer, in most cases eventhough there are resources available they don't win the case. Taxpayers represent themselves in court before the IRS. In most cases, the IRS wins, if the IRS suspects they will not prevail in court, they almost always settle the case before it goes before the court.The untold story is that very few cases make their way to the court system. Most IRS audits, collection agreements, and other matters are resolved administratively within the walls of the IRS. In rare circumstances, the IRS takes a few “winning” cases to court to use as compliance leverage with taxpayers. Some court disputes originate from taxpayers making a last stand against the IRS.Taxpayers although is provided by tax professionals but IRS always finds a way to oppress a legit complaint .In all, I would say that proper protection for the complaint is missing for taxpayers complaint rather than proper resources.

The fact that surprised me is that IRS has created everything on behalf of taxpayers only to uplift their credibilty in all ways and exploit taxpayers. And it also provides some benefits to tax payers so that they may not be felt exploited.With the above example eventhought the tax payer barely wins any case, IRS provides the benefit when an appeal is filed often IRS reduce (or even eliminate) previously assessed taxes and penaltie of the taxpayer.

In conclusion, I would say that taxpayer is not less of resources for their allegation but there is no protection for the allegation by the tax payer and the fact that surprised me is that IRS creates branches so that they can uplift their work oppress taxpayers in many ways.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
The Internal Revenue Code (legislated by Congress) is the highest tax authority in the country. The...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • which statements is not true about tax law sources? a. The Internal Revenue Code serves as...

    which statements is not true about tax law sources? a. The Internal Revenue Code serves as the highest legislative authority for tax research, planning and compliance activities. b. Administrative tax law sources include regulations and revenue rulings. C. A taxpayer can choose any trial court and be assured that the ruling will be the same for all taxpayers with the same fact situation. d. A Tax Court Regular decision has the same authoritative weight as a Memo decision. e. None

  • 1. Which of the following is true of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? a. It...

    1. Which of the following is true of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? a. It includes statutes and regulations. b. It has not been changed since 1986. c. Each Code section has a number that is unique from others. d. More than one is true. 2. Which of the following is not true of the Treasury Regulations? a. They are an official interpretation of the statute by the Treasury Department. b. They are organized by Code Section numbers. c....

  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion...

    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion in requiring Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. ("taxpayer"), to use the accrual method of accounting to compute its federal taxes for the tax years at issue. In particular, the Commissioner contests the Tax Court's finding that emulsified asphalt is not "merchandise," as that term is used in 26 C.F.R.S 1.471-1. The Tax Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C.SS 6213, 6214, and 7442. We...

  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion...

    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion in requiring Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. ("taxpayer"), to use the accrual method of accounting to compute its federal taxes for the tax years at issue. In particular, the Commissioner contests the Tax Court's finding that emulsified asphalt is not "merchandise," as that term is used in 26 C.F.R.S 1.471-1. The Tax Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C.SS 6213, 6214, and 7442. We...

  • A paid tax preparer is required to have a PTIN number, give the client a copy...

    A paid tax preparer is required to have a PTIN number, give the client a copy of the return, and keep a copy for your records for five years. True False In cases where the understatement of tax is due to unrealistic positions: A tax preparer that prepares income taxes for a fee shall receive a penalty the greater of $5,000 or 50% of the income derived by the tax return preparer with respect to the return or claim. True...

  • [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In the largest criminal tax case ever...

    [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In the largest criminal tax case ever filed, KPMG admitted it engaged in a fraud that generated at least $11 billion dollars in phony tax losses, which, according to court papers, cost the United States at least $2.5 billion dollars in evaded taxes. In addition to KPMG's former deputy chairman, the individuals indicted included two former heads of KPMG's tax practice and a former tax partner in the New York City...

  • Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are...

    Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...

  • CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a...

    CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT