Consider a relation R(A, B, C, D) with the functional dependencies {AB → C, C → D, D → A}. Does BC → A hold on R? Explain.
show steps.
BC-->A holds in relation R
we have C-->D and D-->A functional dependencies
By transitive dependency
we can write C-->A
By augmentaion rule we can add additinal element on right hand and left hand
hence BC-> A hold in R
Consider a relation R(A, B, C, D) with the functional dependencies {AB → C, C →...
Consider a relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with the following functional dependencies: 8. AB C BCD CDE DEA (a) Specify all candidate keys for R. (b) Which of the given functional dependencies are Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) violations'? (c) Give a decomposition of R into BCNF based on the given functional dependencies. (d) Give a different decomposition of R into BCNF based on the given functional dependencies. (e) Give a decomposition of R into 3NF based on the given functional dependencies.
Consider the following relation: R(A,B,C,D,E) The following set of functional dependencies are ture on the relation R: FD: AB -> E, E -> D, AD -> C Which of the following sets of attributes does not functionally determine C? AC ABE BD AE AB
Consider relation R(A,B,C,D) with functional dependencies: B → C D→ A BA → D CD → B Decompose R into Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF). Clearly show all intermediary steps.
Consider a relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with the following functional dependencies: 8. AB C BCD CDE DEA (a) Specify all candidate keys for R. (b) Which of the given functional dependencies are Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) violations'? (c) Give a decomposition of R into BCNF based on the given functional dependencies. (d) Give a different decomposition of R into BCNF based on the given functional dependencies. (e) Give a decomposition of R into 3NF based on the given functional dependencies.
Consider a...
Consider the following relation R(A,B,C,D,E,G) and the set of functional dependencies F = { A → BCD BC → DE B → D D → A} Give a 3NF decomposition of the given schema based on a canonical cover
Consider the following definition of equivalent sets of functional dependencies on a relation: “Two sets of functional dependencies F and F’ on a relation R are equivalent if all FD’s in F’ follow from the ones in F, and all the FD’s in F follow from the ones in F’.” Given a relation R(A, B, C) with the following sets of functional dependencies: F1 = {A B, B C}, F2 = {A B, A C}, and...
Here's a relation (R), its attributes and its functional dependencies (F): R(A, B, C, D, E) C D → B A → D D → C E → C What is the closure of AB ({AB}+)? What is the closure of F (F+)? [ set of closures for all LHS][each LHS on one line] What is the minimal set (cover) for F? Provide a key for relation R (a minimal set of attributes that can determine all attr.) Decompose the...
Databases Consider the following functional dependencies that hold on R(ABCDEF): AB-> CD, E -> C, B -> EF a) Is R in 3NF? b) Explain your answer in detail and decompose the relation, as necessary, into a collection of relations that are in 3NF. c) Make sure you first find all the key(s) of R so that you will be able to tell whether an attribute is prime. *Please answer all parts of this question in detail for credit.
5. [5 points] Let relation R (A, B, C, D, E) satisfy the following functional dependencies: AB → C BC → D CD → E DE → A AE → B Which one of the following FDs is also guaranteed to be satisfied by R? A. B. BCD → A A-B D. CE → B
Language: SQL - Normalization and Functional
Dependencies
Part 4 Normalization and Functional Dependencies Consider the following relation R(A, B, C, D)and functional dependencies F that hold over this relation. F=D → C, A B,A-C Question 4.1 (3 Points) Determine all candidate keys of R Question 4.2 (4 Points) Compute the attribute cover of X-(C, B) according to F Question 43 (5 Points) Compute the canonical cover of F.Show each step of the generation according to the algorithm shown in class....