1. What is wrong with the following proof that shows all integers are equal? (Please explain which step in this proof is incorrect and why is it so.) Let P(n) be the proposition that all the numbers in any set of size n are equal.
1) Base case: P(1) is clearly true.
2) Now assume that P(n) is true. That is for any set of size n all the numbers are the same. Consider any set of n + 1 numbers, lets call them a1,a2,··· ,an+1.
3) By the induction hypothesis for the set {a1,a2,··· ,an} (the first n elements) we know that a1 = a2 = ··· = an.
4) Also using the induction hypothesis for the set {a2,a3,··· ,an+1} (the last n elements) we have a2 = a3 = ··· = an+1.
5) Combining these identities together shows that a1 = a2 = ··· = an+1.
6) This shows that P(n + 1) is true and finishes the proof by
induction.
Step-2 and step -4 are Wrong..
In step -2 we stated that Hypothesis says that our result is true for any set of n numbers which is not true because Hypothesis always states that result true for first n number (1,2,3,....,n) not any set of n number.
There are two type of proof by induction
Weak induction-Hypothesis states that result hold for the set which contains first n numbers.
Strong induction-Hypothesis states that result hold for all the set which contains element from first n numbers.
But none of hypothHypo states that result hold for any n number because it hold for a fixed set of n number.
1. What is wrong with the following proof that shows all integers are equal? (Please explain...
3) What is wrong with the following proof that all horses have the same color? Let P(n) be the proposition that all the horses in a set of n horses are the same color. Clearly, P(1) is true. Now assume that P(n) is true. That is, assume that all the horses in any set of n horses are the same color Consider any n1 horses; number these as horses 1,2,3,...,n,n +1. Now the first n of these horses all must...
Someone help please Let A be an array of 5 integers, whose contents are as follows: 3, 2, 1, 5, 4 We will apply quick sort to sort this array. Show all of the element-wise comparisons made by the algorithm in the correct order. Here an element-wise comparison means the comparison of one element of the array with another element of the array or the key set in a particular step of the algorithm. Since the algorithm may move the...
11: I can identify the predicate being used in a proof by mathematical induction and use it to set up a framework of assumptions and conclusions for an induction proof. Below are three statements that can be proven by induction. You do not need to prove these statements! For each one clearly state the predicate involved; state what you would need to prove in the base case; clearly state the induction hypothesis in terms of the language of the proposition...
(4). (25 points) The following problem contains a proposition and a sketch of an (weak) induction proof. Please produce a well-worded precise proof making sure to use all of the required elements of an (weak) induction proof and justifying all steps: Proposition: Let x>-1 then for each ne N, (1 + x)" > 1+ nx Proof: Sketch: True for n = 1. If true for n then (1 + x)(1 + x)" > (1 + x)(1 + nx). With algebra...
What is wrong with the following proof that every positive integer equals the nex larger positive integer? "Proof," Let P(n) be the proposition that n = n + 1, Assume that P(k) is true, so that k = k + 1 . Add 1 to both sides of this equation to obtain k + 1-k + 2 . Since this is the statement P(k 1), It follows that P(n) is true for all positive integers n.
: Let a1, a2, a3, . . . be the sequence of integers defined by a1 = 1 and defined for n ≥ 2 by the recurrence relation an = 3an−1 + 1. Using the Principle of Mathematical Induction, prove for all integers n ≥ 1 that an = (3 n − 1) /2 .
In the following problem, we will work through a proof of an important theorem of arithmetic. Your job will be to read the proof carefully and answer some questions about the argument. Theorem (The Division Algorithm). For any integer n ≥ 0, and for any positive integer m, there exist integers d and r such that n = dm + r and 0 ≤ r < m. Proof: (By strong induction on the variable n.) Let m be an arbitrary...
Consider the sequence {an} defined recursively as: a0 = a1 = a2 = 1, an = an−1+an−2+an−3 for any integer n ≥ 3. (a) Find the values of a3, a4, a5, a6. (b) Use strong induction to prove an ≤ 3n−2 for any integer n ≥ 3. Clearly indicate what is the base step and inductive step, and indicate what is the inductive hypothesis in your proof.
prove the product of 4 consecutive integers is always divisible by 24 using the principles of math induction. Could anyone help me on this one? Thanks in advance!Sure For induction we want to prove some statement P for all the integers. We need: P(1) to be true (or some base case) If P(k) => P(k+1) If the statement's truth for some integer k implies the truth for the next integer, then P is true for all the integers. Look at...
Let P(n) be the proposition that a set with n elements has 2" subsets. What would the basis step to prove this proposition PO) is true, because a set with zero elements, the empty set, has exactly 2° = 1 subset, namely, itself. 01 Ploi 2. This is not possible to prove this proposition. 3. po 3p(1) is true, we need to show first what happens a set with 1 element. Because, we can't do P(O), that is not allowed....