This is concemed with the value of houses in towns surounding Boston. It uses the data ofHarison, D., and D. L. Bubinfeld (1973), "Hedonic Prices and the Demand for Clean Air," Joumal of Environmental Economics and Management, 5, 81-102 The output appears in the table below. The variables are defined as follows: VALUE = median value of owner-occupied homes in thousands of dollars CRIME per capita crime rate NITOX = nitric oxide concentration (parts per million) ROOMS = AGE = proportion of owner-occupied units built prior to 1940 DIST-weighted distances to five Boston employment centers in miles ACCESS = index of accessibility to radial highways TAX-full-value property-tax rate per $10,000 PTRATIO-pupil-teacher ratio by town average number ofrooms per dwelling Dependent Variable: VALUE Included observation: 506 Variable Coefficient 28.4067 0.1834 Std. Error 5.3659 0.0365 CRIME NITOX ROOMS 22.8109 6.3715 0478 n.3353 4.1607 0.3924 0.0141 0.2001 0.0723 ACCESS TAX PTRATIO 0.2723 0.0126 168 0.0038 0.1394
a) For one unit increase in per capita crime rate , median value of owner occupied homes fall by $183.449
For one unit increase in nitric oxide concentration i.e. pollution , median value of owner occupied homes fall by $22810.88 .
For one unit increase in average number of rooms per dwelling , median value of owner occupied homes increase by $6371.512 .
For one unit increase in owner occupied units built prior to 1940 , median value of owner occupied homes fall by $47.750
For one unit increase in distance to work , median value of owner occupied homes fall by $1335.269 .
For one unit increase in accessibility to radial highways , median value of owner occupied homes increase by $272.282
For $10,000 increase in full value property tax , median value of owner occupied homes fall by $12.592
For one unit increase in pupil-teacher ratio , median value of owner occupied homes fall by $1176.787 .
b) CRIME
alpha = 1 - CI/100 = 1- (95/100) = 0.05
df = n - 9 ( 8 variables and one intercept)
= 506- 9 = 497
Critical t value from t table at 95% CI is for 2 tailed test is -1.648
Margin of error = critical value*SE = -1.648*0.036489 = -0.060
Thus 95 %CI is -0.183449 + -0.060
-0.243449 AND -0.123449
ACCESS
alpha = 1 - CI/100 = 1- (95/100) = 0.05
df = n - 9 ( 8 variables and one intercept)
= 506- 9 = 497
Critical t value from t table at 95% CI is for 2 tailed test is -1.648
Margin of error = critical value*SE = -1.648*0.072276 = -0.119
Thus 95 %CI is 0.272282 + -0.119.
0.153282 AND 0.391282
c) Coefficient is 7000/1000 = 7 .
alpha = 1 - 95/100 = 0.05
Critical probability = 1-alpha/2 = 1-0.05/2 = 0.975.
0.6371 is the coefficient given.
Critical t value from t table at 95% CI is for 2 tailed test is -1.648
Margin of error = critical value*SE = -1.648*392387 = -0.6466
Thus 95 %CI is 6.371 + -0.6466.
7.01776 and 5.7244
7 falls under this CI. So, this is statistically significant.
d) PT RATIO
alpha = 1 - CI/100 = 1- (95/100) = 0.05
df = n - 9 ( 8 variables and one intercept)
= 506- 9 = 497
Critical t value from t table at 95% CI is for 2 tailed test is -1.648
Margin of error = critical value*SE = -1.648*0.139415 = -0.2297
Thus 95 %CI is -1.176787 + -0.2297.
-0.947 AND -1.406
Coefficient is -10,000/1000*10 [ because we are scaling the dollar to 1000 and also looking at 10 unit change and not 1]
= -100.
Also scaling the CI to -94.7 and -140.6 .
Thus THIS IS ALSO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT.
This is concemed with the value of houses in towns surounding Boston. It uses the data...
A realtor is studying housing values in the suburbs of Boston, and has given you a dataset with the following attributes for each house: crime rate in the neighborhood, proximity to the Charles River, number of rooms, house color, age of unit, distance to five Boston employment centers, pupil-teacher ratio by town, and house value (the target variable with values high and low). The realtor would like you to build a classification model that not only performs well, but is...