All the options are correct we can derive each option using the grammar given.
Option 1-
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 0A | 0A | 00A |
A → 1A | 00A | 001A |
A → 1A | 001A | 0011A |
A → 0A | 0011A | 00110A |
A → 0 | 00110A | 001100 |
OR
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 0A | 0A | 00A |
A → 1A | 00A | 001A |
A → 1A | 001A | 0011A |
A → 0A | 0011A | 00110A |
A → 0A | 00110A | 001100A |
A → ɛ | 001100A | 001100 |
Option 2-
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 0A | 0A | 00A |
A → 1A | 00A | 001A |
A → 1 | 001A | 0011 |
Or
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 0A | 0A | 00A |
A → 1A | 00A | 001A |
A → 1A | 001A | 0011A |
A → ɛ | 0011A | 0011 |
Option3-
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 0A | 0A | 00A |
A → 1A | 00A | 001A |
A → 0A | 001A | 0010A |
A → 0 | 0010A | 00100 |
Or
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 0A | 0A | 00A |
A → 1A | 00A | 001A |
A → 0A | 001A | 0010A |
A → 0A | 0010A | 00100A |
A → ɛ | 00100A | 00100 |
Option 4-
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 1A | 0A | 01A |
A → 1A | 01A | 011A |
A → 0 | 011A | 0110 |
Or
Rule | Application | Result |
---|---|---|
Start → A | Start | A |
A → 0A | A | 0A |
A → 1A | 0A | 01A |
A → 1A | 01A | 011A |
A → 0A | 011A | 0110A |
A → ɛ | 0110A | 0110 |
Note: In each case, ambiguity arises as we can derive each option in two ways.
Question 1 Consider CFG: A => OA1A01 epsilon, Which of these strings can be generated with...
can you plzz do question 1 and 2 Question 1. Design a CFG for the language over = {1, #} whose elements consist of every pair of distinct, #-separated unary values: L = {rı#x2 | 21, 22 € 1", 21 * x2}. Question 2. Design a CFG for the language of binary strings that contain at least one 1 in their second half: L = {uv | UE (OU 1)", v € OU 1)*1(0U 1)", [u '}. Question 3. This...
Design a CFG for the strings over {0,1} which contain more 1’s than 0’s. Hint: Draw possible “hill/valley” plots. Dissect each segment you see into simpler structures you’ve seen before. Design a CFG for each, and then piece them together.
1. Give a context-free grammar for the set BAL of balanced strings of delimiters of three types (), and . For example, (OOis in BAL but [) is not. Give a nondeterministic pushdown automata that recognizes the set of strings in BAL as defined in problem 1 above. Acceptance should be by accept state. 2. Give a context free grammar for the language L where L-(a"b'am I n>-o and there exists k>-o such that m-2*ktn) 3. Give a nondeterministic pushdown...
Question 9 (10 points) Consider the following EBNF grammar for a “Calculator Language": <calculation> → <expr>= <expr> <term> (+1-) <expr> <term> <term> <factor> (* ) <term> <factor> <factor> → (<expr>) <value> <value> → [<sign> ] <unsigned> [. <unsigned> ] <unsigned> <digit> { <digit> } <digit> → 01|2|3|4|567| 8 | 9 <sign> → +|- which of the following sentences is in the language generated by this grammar ? Why? a. 3/+2.5 = b. 5-*3/4= c. (3/-2) + 3 = d. 5...
Question 2 Which language is generated by the grammar below? S → OA | 1B A 1A | 11 BOBO Select the correct answer. L= {W : € {0,1}} L = {01" :n > 2} U{10 : m >0} L = {01": n > 2} {10% : m > 1} L = {Owll: w € {0,1}} {lwo: W € {0,1}}
QUESTION 3 Here is a nondeterministic finite automaton with epsilon-transitions. 1 1 Start €,0 0 € 90 91 92 93 95 94 Which of the following strings is NOT accepted? 10101 01110 01111 11110 The following nondeterministic finite automaton: 1 0 А B 0 1 accepts which of the following strings? 1001011 0111011 0101010 1010101
can you answer both of these please. QUESTION 1 Given two languages L(A, b ) and M -(aa,A], which of the following is the product of LM? aa.aaa,baa.a,사 (aa,baa,b.A (aa,aaa,baa,b,a QUESTION 2 Given the grammar S->aTb Which of the following strings cannot be generated by the grammar ? ab abbb Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.
Question 9 (10 points) Consider the following EBNF grammar for a "Calculator Language": <calculation> <expr> = <expr> > <term> (+1-) <expr> <term <term> <factor> (* ) <term> <factor> <factor> > (<expr>) value> <value> → [<sign> ] <unsigned [. <unsigned> ] <unsigned> <digit> { <digit> } <digit → 011121314151617189 <sign → + - which of the following sentences is in the language generated by this grammar? Whx.2 a. 3/+2.5 = b. 5- *3/4= c. (3/-2) + 3 = d. 5++3 =
1. (15 pts) Consider the following BNF grammar: For each of the strings below, indicate whether or not the string can be derived from the grammar. ?f so, provide a derivation. (a) (5 pts) aabccd (b) (5 pts) accbcc (c) (5 pts) acccce
Select all the alternative(s) (1 or more) that show(s) strings generated by the following regex: ( 1 ∪ ε ) ( 01 ) ∗ ( 0 ∪ ε )IMPORTANT NOTICE: There will not be any partial credits assigned to this question. You need to select all alternatives that are correct to receive 4 points. Group of answer choices 1010101 0011001100 1100110011 10 0101010