Assume a server which offers some information which must not be exposed publicly. A client of this which may be e.g. a windows service (or at least something executing headless) needs to access the information on the first server.
So the client needs to trust that he is talking to the correct server and the server needs to trust that he is talking to the correct (authenticated and authorized client).
The information transactions must be obscured, i.e. crypted.
What is the best strategy to achieve this kind of security when it is a requirement that the client is running silently, headless and cannot/shall not ask interactively for credentials from a user on the client site ?
Some kind of integration into AD (another forest) ?
Client certificate (number of clients is fairly low and the burden to handle this is not too big).
Other ?
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the answer.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.
Assume a server which offers some information which must not be exposed publicly. A client of...
Neo needs to break into the server room, but he has only partial information about the code that opens the door. Parts of the code are known, and other parts have been narrowed down to several options, which are listed inside parentheses. He also knows the sum of all of the digits in the code. Write a recursive method that will find the correct code. If the given pattern was “1(2,34)5(3,2)”, then the code must start with 1 and have...
Risk management in Information Security today Everyday information security professionals are bombarded with marketing messages around risk and threat management, fostering an environment in which objectives seem clear: manage risk, manage threat, stop attacks, identify attackers. These objectives aren't wrong, but they are fundamentally misleading.In this session we'll examine the state of the information security industry in order to understand how the current climate fails to address the true needs of the business. We'll use those lessons as a foundation...
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...