Looking to the first table, you have to analyse if the reaction rate reference (i.e., for [CBGP]o = 0.05 mol/L) is correct. At [CBGP]o = 5.81x10-2 M (higher conc.) the relative reaction rate is 0.859 (lower). This situation is not acceptable. Thus I will correct the reference value to a more plausible value [S] = [CBGP]o = 0.10 mol/L.
To find Km, plot reaction rate vs. [S].
[S] |
r. rate |
0 |
0 |
0.0125 |
0.398 |
0.0384 |
0.669 |
0.0581 |
0.859 |
0.0913 |
1 |
0.1 |
1 |
[S] |
Inhib PhBu |
0 |
0 |
0.0125 |
0.172 |
0.0250 |
0.301 |
0.0400 |
0.344 |
0.0550 |
0.548 |
[S] |
Inhib Benz |
0 |
0 |
0.0175 |
0.183 |
0.0250 |
0.201 |
0.0500 |
0.231 |
0.1000 |
0.246 |
Something is also wrong with the experimental data (see graph “inhib PhBut”)
Read on the “no inhibitor” graph:
Km is [S] for v=vmax/2 . As relative value vmax = 1 For v=0.5 [S] = Km = 0.022
Catalytic efficiency kcat = vmax/[carboxypeptidase]o, no data to calculate it
For the mechanism of inhibition you have to use the Lineweaver-Burk plot.
But you don’t have all necessary and good experimental data. Verify them first.
The enzyme carboxypeptidase catalyses the hydrolysis of polypeptides and here we consider its inhibition. The following...
20.8 2) Consider the following data for an enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis reaction in the presence and absence of inhibitor I using a Michaelis-Menten plot, determine Kn for both inhibited and uninhibited reactions. What kind of inhibition is this? [Substrate)(M) vo (umol/min) Vos (moles/min) 6x106 4.2 1x105 29 5.8 2x105 6x109 13.6 1.8x10* 16.2
2. hypothesize the best conditions (pH and temperature) under which the enzyme chymotrypsin functions with an appropriate reference. also, hypothesize what will occur in the presence of an inhibitor and the type of inhibition. EXPERIMENT 5: ENZYME ACTIVITY WITH a-CHYMOTRYPSIN Prelab Assignment 1. Prepare a flow chart, covering one half of the experimental work (either part A and C if your lab bench is on the window side of the lab or part B and D if your locker is...
Based on the document below, 1. Describe the hypothesis Chaudhuri et al ids attempting to evaluate; in other words, what is the goal of this paper? Why is he writing it? 2. Does the data presented in the paper support the hypothesis stated in the introduction? Explain. 3.According to Chaudhuri, what is the potential role of thew alkaline phosphatase in the cleanup of industrial waste. CHAUDHURI et al: KINETIC BEHAVIOUR OF CALF INTESTINAL ALP WITH PNPP 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10,...