Question

answer in three paragraphs

3. Although Armstrong and Quine are at odds in several respects, they both suggest drawing philosophical conclusions from scientific study. Explain this similarity. Analyze their use of science to inform and guides their philosophic views and explain how Armstrong and Quine's reliance on science differs.

Answer 1

Armstrong suggests that it's right for modern philosophers to believe that the most effective tool (method) we've got to discovering truth nature of the human mind is science. Scientists he admits might disagree, however fashionable science accepts a “purely physio-chemical account of man.” (This is its paradigm – therefore to speak). Scientists World Health Organization ail this paradigm sometimes do therefore from spiritual or ethical views, instead of having valid, scientific objections. Armstrong offers many reasons for permitting science the authority during this matter, citing (among different things) its ‘unique’ ability to achieve an accord and its capability for progress.

Quine’s read of philosophical inquiry breaks resolutely with the a priori conception of philosophy’s relevance science as seen in Plato, Rene Descartes and Kant. though he finds himself additional in sympathy with the philosopher tradition (this is very true with relevance each Russell’s and Carnap’s distinctive tries to create philosophy additional scientific), he additionally rejects what he sees as its conceive to preserve the a priori standing of logic and arithmetic through the excellence between analytic and artificial statements (1981, 67-72). the essential conception of philosophy and philosophical observe that informs his discussion of science is often recognize as naturalism, a read that recommends the “abandonment of the goal of a primary philosophy before natural science” (1981, 67), that additional involves a “readiness to envision philosophy as scientific discipline trained upon itself and permissible free use of scientific findings”

These remarks indicate that Quine rejects the read that philosophy maintains some distinctive perspective, or sort of information that distinguishes it from science, and that might additional function a freelance position from that to critically assess or ground the ways and procedures found in science. Consequently, he recommends the pursuit of philosophical problems from among the accessible resources of the empirical sciences themselves.

please like answer by giving thumb up to motivate the expert to improve quality.