Question

Analyze: There is considerable debate within your firm concerning the effect of advertising on sales. The...

Analyze: There is considerable debate within your firm concerning the effect of advertising on sales. The marketing department believes advertising has a large positive effect; others are not so sure. For instance, the production and technical staffs believe the quality of the product itself largely determines sales. To clarify the debate, you have gathered the attached data for the last 24 quarters. Also refer to an Introduction to Regression in MS-Excel as needed.

a. Does advertising affect unit sales? Base your written explanation on the results of a regression analysis.

b. Others in the company argue that the last quarter’s sales best predict this quarter’s sales. Test this hypothesis via regression analysis.

Compare the performance of the regressions in parts (a) and (b).

c. Some believe the impact of advertising takes time (as long as three months) to affect sales. Perform a regression to test this hypothesis and interpret the results.

d. Provide your best estimate and your calculation of the own-advertising elasticity of demand from your analysis. Evaluate the elasticity at the mean value of the independent variable(s).

e. Because of a recent, new marketing plan, some at your firm argue that the effectiveness of advertising has changed over time and especially 2012-2013 compared to 2016-2017. Using dummy independent variables in your regression, test this hypothesis and take a justifiable stand on the argument.

Year Quarter Unit Sales Advertising Dum12_13 Dum16_17
2012 1 120 39 1 0
2012 2 115 36 1 0
2012 3 97 38 1 0
2012 4 118 39 1 0
2013 1 88 23 1 0
2013 2 63 22 1 0
2013 3 82 40 1 0
2013 4 80 42 1 0
2014 1 95 36 0 0
2014 2 106 49 0 0
2014 3 105 66 0 0
2014 4 136 65 0 0
2015 1 122 51 0 0
2015 2 112 56 0 0
2015 3 116 60 0 0
2015 4 104 51 0 0
2016 1 137 55 0 1
2016 2 114 47 0 1
2016 3 104 50 0 1
2016 4 122 47 0 1
2017 1 108 32 0 1
2017 2 94 41 0 1
2017 3 98 45 0 1
2017 4 104 34 0 1
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

a).

So, here we have to regress “Sales” on “Advertising”. Consider the following regression result.

SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple F R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.60927623 0.37121753

So, the estimated regression equation is given by

=> Sales = 65.2562 + 0.9153*Advertise, => if “Advertising” increases by “$1”, => the “Sales” will also increase by “$0.92”. Now, the “p-value” of the coefficient of “Advertising” is “0.0016=0.16% < 1%”, => “Advertising” is a significant at “1%” level of significance.

b).

Now, here we have to regress “Sales” on “Advertising” only for the last quarter. Consider the new data set and the regression result.

Year QuarterUnit Sales Advertising Dum1 13 Dum16 17 118 80 136 104 122 104 39 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 4 4 4 42 4 47 4 3

SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple F R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.58136294 0.33798287

So, the estimated equation is given by, => Sales = 63.14 + 1.03*Advertise, => if “Advertising” increases by “$1”, => the “Sales” will also increase by “$1.03”, => approximately by “$1”. Now, the “p-value” of the coefficient of “Advertising” is “0.2262 = 22.62% > 5%”, => “Advertising” is not a significant at “5%” level of significance. So, here we can’t say that the “last quarter sales” will better predict the “Sales”.

Now, if we compare the regression result of “part a” and “part b” then we can see that the “part a” has higher “R^2”, => “part a” shows better result compare to “part b”.

c).

Some people believe that the impact of “Advertising” takes time to affects sales, => here we have to introduce new variable “Advertising-1” will takes the value of previous quarter’s adverting values, => the new data set and regression result is given by.

Unit Sales Advertising-t 115 97 118 39 36 38 39 23 63 82 30) 40 42 36 49 106 105 136 122 112 116 104 137 114 104 122 108 94 9

SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple F R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.75035621 0.56303444

So, the estimated equation is given by, => Sales = 54.58 + 1.13*Advertise, => if “Advertising-1” increases by “$1”, => the “Sales” will also increase by “$1.13”. Now, the “p-value” of the coefficient of “Advertising-1” is “0.000037 < 1%”, => “Advertising” is significant at “1%” level of significance. Now, the “R^2” is also larger compare to “part-a”, => we can say that “Advertising-1” has much more effect compare to “Advertising”.

d).

Now, to get the elasticity we need the “log values” of the data set. So, the new data set is given below.

1 Year Quarter Unit Sales Log(Sales) Advertising Log Advertising) 136 122 104 104 1 122 3 4 104

SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple F R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.6454037 0.41654593 0

So, here the estimated regression equation is given by, “Log(Sales) = 1.36 + 0.4037*Log(Advertising)”, => the elasticity is “0.40”, => as “Advertising” increases by “1%”, => the “Sales” also increases by “0.4%”.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Analyze: There is considerable debate within your firm concerning the effect of advertising on sales. The...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Analyze: There is considerable debate within your firm concerning the effect of advertising on sa...

    Analyze: There is considerable debate within your firm concerning the effect of advertising on sales. The marketing department believes advertising has a large positive effect; others are not so sure. For instance, the production and technical staffs believe the quality of the product itself largely determines sales. To clarify the debate, you have gathered the attached data for the last 24 quarters. Also refer to an Introduction to Regression in MS-Excel as needed. e. Because of a recent, new marketing...

  • Year Quarter Sales (in Billions) 2009 1 2.62 2009 2 2.33 2009 3 2.4 2009 4...

    Year Quarter Sales (in Billions) 2009 1 2.62 2009 2 2.33 2009 3 2.4 2009 4 2.42 2010 1 2.72 2010 2 2.53 2010 3 2.61 2010 4 2.84 2011 1 2.95 2011 2 2.79 2011 3 2.93 2011 4 3.03 2012 1 3.44 2012 2 3.2 2012 3 3.3 2012 4 3.36 2013 1 3.79 2013 2 3.56 2013 3 3.74 2013 4 3.8 2014 1 4.24 2014 2 3.87 2014 3 4.15 2014 4 4.18 2015 1 4.8...

  • You are projecting future sales and have constructed a linear model using historical sales data for...

    You are projecting future sales and have constructed a linear model using historical sales data for each of the four quarters between years 2011 and 2014. Answer questions 24-28 using the information below Regression Statistics Multiple R Obs Quarter Year Sales Sales 1 1 2011 71 0.995 2 2 2011 49 R Square 0.990 90 3 3 2011 58 Adjusted R Square 0.986 80 4 4 2011 78 Standard Error 1561 70 1 2012 68 Observations 16 60 6 2...

  • Multiple Regression Analysis The company has been able to determine that its sales in dollars depend...

    Multiple Regression Analysis The company has been able to determine that its sales in dollars depend on advertising and of the number of sellers and for this reason, it uses the data from previous years to be able to forecast possible sales for the year 2020. Y X1 ($ 000) X2 ($ 000) Year S ales Advertising Salesman 2013 $ 10 $1 2014 $15 $ 2 2015 $25 $3 2016 $ 40 $5 2017 $ 70 $6 2018 $ 110...

  • Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Sales...

    Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Sales $ 503,999 $ 327,272 $ 259,740 $ 175,500 $ 130,000 Cost of goods sold 254,500 165,436 133,120 89,350 65,000 Accounts receivable 24,494 19,145 17,792 10,284 8,905 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2013 as the base year. Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 Sales Cost of goods sold Accounts receivable 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $ 503,999 $...

  • Using the model, predict sales for the fourth quarter of year 2015 You are projecting future...

    Using the model, predict sales for the fourth quarter of year 2015 You are projecting future sales and have constructed a linear model using historical sales data for each of the four quarters between years 2011 and 2014. Answer questions 24-28 using the information below Regression Statistics Obs Quarter Year Sales Sales 1 2011 71 Multiple R 0.995 7 2011 49 R Square 0.990 90 58 3 2011 Adjusted R Square 0.986 80 4 2011 78 Standard Error 1.561 70...

  • Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 Sales $443,487 $291,768 $235,297 $170,505 $126,300...

    Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 Sales $443,487 $291,768 $235,297 $170,505 $126,300 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2013 as the base year. Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 Sales Cost of goods sold Accounts receivable 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $ 443,487 $ 291,768 $ 235, 297 $ 170,505 $ 126, 300 233,163 153,319 125,704 90,413 65, 676 21,420 17,010 16,071 9,957 8,639 1:52:10 Compute trend percents for the...

  • Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 Sales Cost of goods sold Accounts...

    Exercise 13-3 Computation and analysis of trend percents LO P1 Sales Cost of goods sold Accounts receivable 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $ 671,646 $ 436,134 $ 353, 145 $ 237, 010 $ 173,000 324,840 210,944 172,710 115,565 83,040 32,642 25, 601 24,190 13,841 11,868 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2013 as the base year. Trend Percent for Net Sales: 1 Choose Denominator: Choose Numerator: Sales 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: Trend Percent for Cost of Goods Sold:...

  • Naïve Sales Forecast Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures What would be...

    Naïve Sales Forecast Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures What would be the forecast for next year's sales using the Naïve approach? 15-1 (LG15-3) Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sales $1,500,000 $1,750,000$1,400,000 $2,000,000 $1,600000

  • 5. XYZ Company recorded the following sales with their marketing budget for the past 12 years Mar...

    5. XYZ Company recorded the following sales with their marketing budget for the past 12 years Markets 99 95 90105 110 108 125 118 122 108 128 140 ) Construct a scatter plot of y (sales) versus xi (year). Discuss whether the scatter plot suggests a simple Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sales 138 135 146 126 142 152 146 168 172 184 164 192 linear regression model might be appropriate. Calculate...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT