1. The mailbox rule provides that an acceptance is valid when it is received by the offeror. True or False
2. A(n) ________ contract is, in effect, not a contract at all.
Multiple Choice
voidable
executory
implied
executed
void
3. Consideration is defined as ________.
Multiple Choice
being cordial in the negotiation of contracts
refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts
being both cordial and refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts
a bargained-for exchange
a contract negotiated in person rather than by telephone or e-mail
4. A ________ is an agreement by the person who issues the letter to pay a sum of money on receipt of an invoice and other documents.
Multiple Choice
commercial bond
letter of credit
letter of acknowledgement
negotiated credit instrument
recognizance
1.The correct answer is :True
According to the mailbox rule,an acceptance is considered to be valid when it is received by the offeror via mail,email etc.
2.The correct answer is :void
A void contract is one that cannot be legally enforced and hence is not a contract at all.
3.The correct answer is :a bargained for exchange
In a contract ,a consideration is a benefit that is agreed upon and bargained between two parties.Generally,in a contract one consideration is exchanged for another consideration by means of bargaining between the two parties.
4.The correct answer is :negotiated credit instrument
A negotiated credit instrument is an agreement where a person agrees to pay the sum of money to the holder of the instrument based on a condition.
1. The mailbox rule provides that an acceptance is valid when it is received by the...
you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d 609 (1974) John SALSBURY, Appellee, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 55960. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1974. Laird, Burington, Bovard & Heiny, Mason City, and William F. McFarlin, Des Moines, for appellant. Boyd G. Hayes, Charles City, and William Pappas, Mason City, for appellee. Considered en banc. HARRIS, Justice. This is the third appeal in which we have considered a claim...
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...