Q.3.
a)
Although there are no dominant or dominated strategies in this game, but this game has a unique Nash equilibrium given by
(B,R). Hence in the equilibrium, player 1 will be playing B and player 2 will be playing R both of them receiving payoff of 2 units each.
b)
Let us first write the best response of the player 1 for different actions of player 2. Remember best response is the response which maximizes a player's payoff given the action taken by the other players.
Similarly writing the best response of player 2, we get:
As we can see from the best responses,
and Nash equilibrium is given by the intersection of the best response function.
Hence Nash equilibrium is (B,R) as we obtained in part (a).
Problems 3,4 and 5 Problem 3. Consider the game below. (a) There are no dominant or...
Problem 4. Bertrand Competition with Different Costs Suppose two firms facing a demand D(p) compete by setting prices simultaneously (Bertrand Competition). Firm 1 has a constant marginal cost ci and Firm 2 has a marginal cost c2. Assume ci < C2, i.e., Firm 1 is more efficient. Show that (unlike the case with identical costs) p1 = C1 and P2 = c2 is not a Bertrand equilibrium.
Problem 4. Bertrand Competition with Different Costs Suppose two firms facing a demand D(p) compete by setting prices simultaneously (Bertrand Competition). Firm 1 has a constant marginal cost ci and Firm 2 has a marginal cost c2. Assume ci < C2, i.e., Firm 1 is more efficient. Show that (unlike the case with identical costs) p1 = (1 and p2 = c2 is not a Bertrand equilibrium.
Problem 2. Cournot Competition with Three Firms Suppose there are three identical firms engaged in quantity competition. The demand is P = 1 - Q where Q = qi + q2 + q3. To simplify, assume that the marginal cost of production is zero. Compute the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., quantities, price, and profits)
Problem 2. Cournot Competition with Three Firms Suppose there are three identical firms engaged in quantity competition. The demand is P=1-Q where Q = 91 +92 +93. To simplify, assume that the marginal cost of production is zero. Compute the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., quantities, price, and profits).
Problem #3: Strictly dominated and non-rationalizable strategies (6 pts) Below, there are three game tables. For each one, identify which strategies are non-rationalizable (if any), and which strategies are strictly dominated (if any). Do this for both players in each game. Note: You don't need to use IESDS or IENBR in this problem: I only want to know which strategies are strictly dominated or non-rationalizable in the games as presented. Rogers Go Rogue Go Legit 2,3 3,4 3,2 5,1 3,1...
S5. Consider the following game table: COLIN North South East West Earth 1,3 3,1 0,2 1,1 Water 1,2 1,2 2,3 1,1 ROWENA Wind 3,2 2,1 1,3 0,3 Fire 2,0 3,0 1,1 2,2 124 [CH. 4] SIMULTANEOUS-MOVE GAMES: DISCRETE STRATEGIES (a) Does either Rowena or Colin have a dominant strategy? Explain why or why not. (b) Use iterated elimination of dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible. Give the order in which the eliminations occur and give the...
Problem 1. Cournot Competition with Two Firms Suppose there are two identical firms engaged in quantity competition (Cournot competition). The demand is P 1 - Qwhere Q qi 2. Assume that firm's i total cost of production is TC(q) = . Compute the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., quantities, price, and profits)
Problem 1. Cournot Competition with Two Firms Suppose there are two identical firms engaged in quantity competition (Cournot competition). The demand is P=1-Q where Q =91 +92. Assume that firm's i total cost of production is TC(qi) Compute the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., quantities, price, and profits).
Problem 3. Cournot Competition with Different Costs Suppose there are two firms engaged in quantity competition. The demand is P = 2 - Q where Q =q1+q2. Assume ci = 1 and c2 = , i.e., Firm 2 is more efficient. Compute the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., quantities, price, and profits).
Problem 3. Cournot Competition with Different Costs Suppose there are two firms engaged in quantity competition. The demand is P = 2 - Q where Q=q1 +22. Assume cı = { and c2 = , i.e., Firm 2 is more efficient. Compute the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., quantities, price, and profits). price, and profits).