Question

under the moral system exposed by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, the property was stolen and destroyed.

uruce Under the moral system espoused by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party property was stolen and destroyed; countries were invaded, looted, and pillaged, and millions of innocent people were raped, mutilated, experimented upon, tortured, and murdered Discuss whether such a system is moral or immoral according to you, basing your answer upon whether you feel morality is relative or absolute the performance dashboard and can be The respohse entered here w viewed by your instructor

Answer 1

According to theories, Morality is relative, it depends upon a particular stance like culture, society etc. Morality basically is the differentiation between what's right and what's wrong. Though morality is relative but on a larger viewpoint I feel it's absolute for eg, some things are moral in one culture and not in another but killing an innocent is absolutely immoral regardless of culture or norms. In my opinion, Morality is absolute and it should be absolute which we can understand with the help of the moral system exposed by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Their moral system may seem moral to them but on larger standpoint, it is not only immoral but also heinous. Stealing, killing, mutilation, rape, torture, etc are wrong and immoral regardless of what it is advertised by anyone that this is necessary or it is okay to do so. These are not just heinous crimes but immoral on all levels. No human has a right to torture, damage or take the life of another human. Morality can be relative in some stances but according to me, it is absolute with respect to a situation like stealing, lying, murder, torture etc. There is no excuse for it, only a delusional or a person with no moral conscience can stoop so low. Such a system cannot be moral.