Question

New York Times, May 19, 2005 Research Finds That Red Is for Winners By JOHN SCHWARTZ...

New York Times, May 19, 2005 Research Finds That Red Is for Winners By JOHN SCHWARTZ Wearing red increases the chance of victory in sports, say British researchers who clearly do not follow the Cincinnati Reds. "Across a range of sports, we find that wearing red is consistently associated with a higher probability of winning," Dr. Russell Hill and Dr. Robert Barton, researchers in evolutionary anthropology at the University of Durham, wrote in a paper that appears today in the journal Nature. The research began a year ago with a hunch based on observations in the animal kingdom, where red coloration is often associated with male dominance, Dr. Barton said in an interview. Zebra finches fitted with red leg bands tend to become dominant, while those given blue bands are more submissive. In humans, anger reddens the face, which may send signals of fierceness. The two researchers studied results of the 2004 Summer Olympics to eliminate the possibility of a home team advantage, and found that contestants in tae kwan do, boxing and wrestling were issued red or blue protective gear at random. "It's almost as if somebody had designed an experiment for us," Dr. Barton said. Dr. Hill said the evidence of a beneficial effect had emerged, with combatants wearing red winning 6 out of 10 bouts in especially close matches. "Even we were surprised at how consistently the results have been coming out across the range of sports we have looked at," he said. They have taken a preliminary look at soccer as well, and found that in the Euro 2004 international soccer tournament, the five teams that wore predominantly red shirts did better. This does not mean that a bad team can reverse its fortunes by wearing red, Dr. Barton said. The study applies only to closely matched competitors. "If you're hopeless," he said, "then wearing red isn't going to make you start winning." In London, a representative of William Hill, a leading betting company, called the study "absolute rubbish." "There is no such thing as equally matched opponents in any human activity," and there are too many individual factors to pronounce a trait like color decisive, the representative, Graham Sharpe, said in an e-mail message. Dr. Barton acknowledged that the work might not hold up under further analysis. "All scientific results are a bit provisional, of course," he said.

In the analysis of the results of the 2004 Summer Olympics:

At which level (nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio) is the independent variable measured? Explain your answer.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Here the IV is the colour of the protective gear (red or blue) and the DV was the result of the matches- win or lose.

Hence since both the levels of the IV and DV are concrete and categorical (red or blue/ win or lose), the nominal scale willbe used. Also a non-parametric statistical technique can be used.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
New York Times, May 19, 2005 Research Finds That Red Is for Winners By JOHN SCHWARTZ...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT