A horse harnessed to a wagon refuses to pull citing Newton’s third law of motion as grounds for not being able to possibly be able to move the wagon. The horse, incorrect in his reasoning, can pull the wagon because:
- the law only applies to static cases
-after it gives a jerk and the wagon is moving, the horse’s pulling force will be greater than the reaction to this force
- the action and reaction forces are acting on different
- the wagon cannot possibly pull back with a force equal in magnitude to the pulling force - after friction is overcome, the reaction force is less than the pulling force
Correct option: the wagon cannot possibly pull back with a force equal in magnitude to the pulling force - after friction is overcome, the reaction force is less than the pulling force
A horse harnessed to a wagon refuses to pull citing Newton’s third law of motion as...
Q1) Answer all Multiple Choice questions.i) Newton’s 1st law is:A. PHYSICALLY INDEPENDENT of the other two laws of motion and CANNOT be dispensed with as an axiom of Newtonian physics.B. PHYSICALLY INDEPENDENT of the other two laws of motion, but nonetheless it CAN be dispensed with as an axiom of Newtonian physics.C. Actually a SPECIAL CASE of the 2ND LAW. The case when the net force is zero. Therefore, logically we need only two laws of motion. Perhaps for clarity...