Question

1. Which of the following is NOT part of the discovery process in civil litigation? A....

1. Which of the following is NOT part of the discovery process in civil litigation?

A. Motion to dismiss the complaint

B. Deposition

C. Interrogatories

D. Request for documents

2. Patrick sues Reid Corp. for employment discrimination. After completing discovery, there is no dispute between the parties about any key fact in the case. The next step in the case should be:

A. The judge orders Reid Corp. to rehire Patrick

B. The judge holds a trial

C. Patrick files an appeal

D. The parties file a motion for summary judgment

3. Which of these courts may decline to review an appeal?

A. The U.S. Supreme Court

B. Any U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

C. The U.S. Circuit Court of Constitutional Appeals

D. No court in the U.S. may decline to review an appeal.

4. Define the term, "the common law."

5. Jane goes to the courthouse to watch the trial in the New Jersey state court case of Smith v. Jones. However, the guard refuses to let her enter the courtroom, explaining that only relatives and friends of the litigants may watch the trial, and Jane is neither a friend nor a relative. Why is the guard's action illegal? Explain.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

IF YOU LIKE THE ANSWER, PLEASE GIVE AN UP-VOTE OR THUMB UP. THIS WILL ENCOURAGE ME TO ANSWER MORE!!

  1. Motion to dismiss the complaint is NOT part of the discovery process in civil litigation. Interrogation exists in discovery process, to know more information aggressively asking questions. Request for documents will provide with evidence and fact. Taking live testimonies is also possible as deposition.
  2. The judge holds a trial. After the discovery process, trial is the only step the judge will go through
  3. The US Supreme Court may decline to review an appeal if it doesn’t want to exercise discretion and grants a writ of certiorari. The rest all would give an appeal.
  4. Common Law is a body of unwritten laws based on previous legal issues established by the courts. It influences the decision making process in unusual cases.
  5. According to the common law, the general public can go to see a trial. Here the watchman didn’t allow Jane to go there and see it. Hence the guard’s action violated the common law and hence is illegal.
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
1. Which of the following is NOT part of the discovery process in civil litigation? A....
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Write a summary of this paragraph, in your own words. Jury Selection Before a jury trial...

    Write a summary of this paragraph, in your own words. Jury Selection Before a jury trial commences, a panel of jurors must be selected. Although some types of trials require twelve-person juries, most civil matters can be heard by six-person juries. The jury selection process is known as voir dire.Footnote In most jurisdictions, attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant ask prospective jurors oral questions to determine whether they are biased or have any connection with a party to the...

  • 1. Which of the following is true of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? a. It...

    1. Which of the following is true of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? a. It includes statutes and regulations. b. It has not been changed since 1986. c. Each Code section has a number that is unique from others. d. More than one is true. 2. Which of the following is not true of the Treasury Regulations? a. They are an official interpretation of the statute by the Treasury Department. b. They are organized by Code Section numbers. c....

  • Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint...

    Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint of the 6th Amendment to tie it back to the Ist! Amendment from last week. Look at the case summary and facts for Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70,127 S. Ct. 649 (2006) A defendant in a murder trial is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury if courtroom spectators wear buttons showing a picture of the deceased. Facts Matthew...

  • 2.        Early English courts a.        relied exclusively on Norman Law. b.        included courts of law and...

    2.        Early English courts a.        relied exclusively on Norman Law. b.        included courts of law and equity. c.         heard cases that only applied to the nobility. d.        were often subject to bribery. 4.        A legal precedent a.        is no longer valid 50 years after the case is decided. b.        is no longer valid 100 years after the case is decided. c.         cannot be overruled. d.        remains valid unless and until overruled by a later case or statute. 5.        Judicial...

  • 1. Which of the following statements is true? a. The serving of written questions, to be answered...

    1. Which of the following statements is true? a. The serving of written questions, to be answered in writing by the opposing party, is known as interrogatories. b. A long-arm statute becomes applicable only in cases in which the court has been found not to have a venue. c. An attorney "cross-examines" a witness who has been called to establish the facts about his or her side of the case. d. If a demurrer entered by the defendant is sustained...

  • TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page...

    TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...

  • Instructions: Read each case, 1 - 7, and choose which forensic psyche identification goes with that...

    Instructions: Read each case, 1 - 7, and choose which forensic psyche identification goes with that particular case. Explain your rationale for your choice. Submit your assignment as an attachment. Case # 1 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) In 1974, Alvin Bernard Ford was convicted of murder, and sentenced to death. While on death row in a Florida prison, Ford’s mental status declined, as he began exhibiting symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Among other wild delusions, Ford declared himself...

  • Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are...

    Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are the facts of this case? What is the issue? 2. In what court was it decided, and how did it get to that court? 3. What did the court below decide, and why? What did this court decide, and why? 4. What does it mean to be "affected with the public interest"? 5. What is the significance of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S....

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT