Using Figure 11-5 and the equations underlying it, show the impact of a technology-forcing standard on a polluter’s incentive to invest in R&D to reduce compliance costs.
As you can clearly see from the graph that after a technology forcing standard, the firm has taken strides in its R&D by reducing marginal abatement costs by a significant amount. This means that the cost associated with reducing one unit of pollutant has decreased than it was before the technological improvement. As a result of this, the emissions have decreased by 2.2 tonnes to 17.78 tonnes, thereby achieving socially optimal point. The polluter's incentive to invest in R&D is nothing but the decreased Marginal Abatement Costs associated. And this benefits socially as well by virtue of the reduced emissions.
Hope this helps. Do hit the thumbs up. Cheers!
Using Figure 11-5 and the equations underlying it, show the impact of a technology-forcing standard on...
A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160–4E a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of pollution...
1. A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160–4E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of...
depicted in the below figure 2. Firm 1 has marginal abatement cost "Firm 1 MAC 1" and Firm 2 has marginal abatement cost "Firm 2 MAC 1" depicted in figure 1. The industry aggregate marginal abatement cost curve "Aggregate MAC 1 is given in figure 2. a. What is the optimal emissions tax? 0.5 points b. Given the optimal emissions tax what is the total cost of abatement and the total damages of pollution? 0.5 points] c. Suppose that Firm...
5. Suppose that there is an industry with two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost curves as follows MAC1 1,000 2E1 MAC2 500 E2 E1 and E2 represent the respective emissions of each firm in tonnes [3] (a) Solve for initial emissions for each fim and rewrite both of the MAC equations as functions of abatement [6] (b) Derive the Industry MAC curve for this industry . Briefly explain each of the steps you take to find the...
Question 3 (11 points) liability Q Consider a firm, which is polluting the water near Good Grief, Idaho. The marginal damage cost of this pollution is given by; MDC - - 6 + 0.75 e where e is the level of emissions. The marginal abatement costs are; MAC - 200 - 2 e. (a) Determine the optimal level of emissions. (b) Draw a diagram showing the MAC, MDC and the optimal level of emissions. On this diagram show the total...