Dear Sir/Madam,
could you answer all the question below.
I appreciate if u can answer all.
Thank You :)
A (Bad?) Day in the Life of a Project Manager
Frank Mills is a Site Agent for McMurray Concrete Ltd which specialises in building concrete structures on industrial sites. His present site is a large chemical plant, Agrochem Ltd that manufactures farm fertilisers. The project he is currently working on is part of a large contract being managed by Design Solutions Plc. who has hired McMurray Concrete and other companies for the actual construction, whilst undertaking all of the design themselves. Frank is thus one of a number of project managers who ultimately report to the Project Director who works for Design Solutions plc.
The elements of the project that Frank is working on involves the installation of a series of reinforced concrete bases (foundation); these are required for a network of large steel tanks and pipework scattered a kilometres across the chemical plant. Typically, construction involves a number of activities: - excavating the ground for foundation; assembling steel cages (the reinforcement for the foundations); carefully positioning the steel cages and bolts into the holes and filling them with fresh concrete; the next part of the contract is carried out by Swift Pipe Ltd who position steel tanks onto the bolts set into the concrete bases and connect up the various tanks with steel pipes. Frank’s job is to co-ordinate construction of the concrete foundations so that they can be handed over to Swift Pipe Ltd. He is directly in charge of the concrete gang who report to his site supervisor and his site engineer (who ensures that the bases are built in the correct location and to the specification shown in the drawings). However, a gang of steel fixers has been subcontracted to assemble the steel cages. Likewise he has subcontracted excavation team whose job it is to dig all the holes for the foundations.
Each day Frank records the progress made against the estimated schedule of works; at the same time he sums the actual amount of concrete which has been used (the sides of excavation have been collapsing leading to excessively large holes!) and the cost of labour. He has managed so far to keep the project on schedule and within budget but it has not been easy. Design Solutions plc, in overall charge of the project, employs its own resident engineer, Jerry Redpath, whose job is to check on the quality of the work on the site at all stages of construction. Frank doesn’t particularly like Jerry, who seems an abrasive character who likes to show off his technical expertise and who doesn’t think he should be involved in what he regards as minor (referring to the importance and prestige of the contract, rather than its size) projects such as this one. Also, he tends to think that all contractors are out to cut corners wherever they can. This has placed an additional strain upon Frank who now has to be doubly sure that he keeps adequate quality records of all concrete sampling and testing which prove the concrete strength is to the correct specification.
Today it seems that he has more problems to deal with! The foreman of the steelfixers has left a note on his desk complaining that one batches of steel delivered is incorrect. Next to this note is the Drawing Revision from Design Solutions which tells him to “please note” that the position of two of the bases have been changed. Frank than receives a telephone call from Swift Pipe Ltd who says that they have just arrived on site and discovered that one of their tanks won’t fit the concrete base and they need to have urgent meeting. As if that is not enough it has been raining heavily through the night and the excavation team slowly attempt to pump out the water from holes dug the previous day.
Appendix A
Appendix B
a) Risk Identified: Change in position of bases after completion of concrete work
i) Risk Evaluation:
ii) Risk Distribution:
b) Procurement Process Flow:
1) Plan Procurement
2) Conduct Procurements
3) Control Procurement
4) Close Procurement
c) The key stakeholders have to be identified first and analysed. As part of the analysis, their position in terms of their power, influence, interest in the project and impact on the project has to be assessed and mapped. A stakeholder management plan has to be created to capture the approach for managing the key stakeholders and controlling the engagement with them. A useful tool for this is a Communications Management Plan that documents the schedule and content of the reporting, the regular schedule of meetings and the stakeholders involved and the escalation matrix in case of any issues. Ensuring there is a regular and transparent flow of communication at different levels and key stakeholders are actively involved in major project desicions and activities, is the best way to manage stakeholders.
Dear Sir/Madam, could you answer all the question below. I appreciate if u can answer all....
How can we assess whether a project is a success or a failure? This case presents two phases of a large business transformation project involving the implementation of an ERP system with the aim of creating an integrated company. The case illustrates some of the challenges associated with integration. It also presents the obstacles facing companies that undertake projects involving large information technology projects. Bombardier and Its Environment Joseph-Armand Bombardier was 15 years old when he built his first snowmobile...