Question

There are two factories in a small town. Both of them emit carbon dioxide into the...

There are two factories in a small town. Both of them emit carbon dioxide into the air. Factory 1 currently emits 120 tons per month, whereas factory 2 currently emits 160 tons per month. The technology of each factory is different, so their costs of reducing emissions are different as well. The tables below show the costs of reducing emissions in increments of 20 tons per month for each factory:

Factory 1
Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month $50
Total cost of reducing emissions by 40 tons/month $150
Total cost of reducing emissions by 60 tons/month $270
Total cost of reducing emissions by 80 tons/month $410
Total cost of reducing emissions by 100 tons/month $570
Factory 2
Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month $20
Total cost of reducing emissions by 40 tons/month $60
Total cost of reducing emissions by 60 tons/month $110
Total cost of reducing emissions by 80 tons/month $200
Total cost of reducing emissions by 100 tons/month $300



The existing technology does not allow for reductions in emissions beyond 100 tons/month. That is, the most each factory could reduce its emissions by is 100 tons/month.

Suppose the government in this town would like to cut monthly emissions to half of the current level. To do that, the government has decided to impose a tax for every 20 tons of pollution per month emitted by a factory. To achieve its desired goal (but not exceed the goal), the tax would have to be set between $____________ and $____________ for every 20 tons/month. (The first number should be the lower end of the tax, and the second number should be the higher end of the tax.)

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Current Emissions

Factory 1 = 120 tons

Factory 2 = 160 tons

Total Emissions = 120 + 160 = 280 tons

Now Government want to reduce emission to 50%

i.e = 50% of 280 tons = 140 tons

Now For both,

Tons reduced per month Factory 1 Cost Marginal Cost factory 1 Factory 2 Cost Marginal Cost factory 1
20 tons 50 50 20 20
40 tons 150 100 60 40
60 tons 270 120 110 50
80 tons 410 140 200 90
100 tons 570 160 300 100

So MArginal Cost of 100 will reduce it by 140 tons - 40 from Factory1 and 100 from factory 2

i.e Tax of 100 pe 20 tons can reduce it by 140 tons

so minimum is 100

If we go beyind 120 than tons reduec will be 160 as FActory 1 will reduce by 60 tons

So Range = 100 - 120 dollars per 20 tons

100 and 120 excluding

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
There are two factories in a small town. Both of them emit carbon dioxide into the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 4. Understanding different policy options to correct for negative externalities Wative Carbon dioxide emissions have been...

    4. Understanding different policy options to correct for negative externalities Wative Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to global warming. The following table lists some possible public policies aimed at reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air For each policy listed, identify whether it is a command-and-control policy (regulation), tradable permie system, corrective subsidy, or corrective tax. Command and Tradable Control Permit Corrective corrective Public Policy Policy System Subsidy Tax The government agrees to reimburse al factories that...

  • 2. Understanding different policy options to correct for negativeexternalities Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to...

    2. Understanding different policy options to correct for negativeexternalities Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to increased air pollution. The following table lists some possible public policies aimed at reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. For each policy listed, identify whether it is a command-and-control policy (regulation), tradable permit system, corrective subsidy, or corrective tax. Command- and- Control Policy Tradable Permit System Corrective Subsidy Corrective Tax Public Policy The government agrees to reimburse all factories that purchase...

  • 4. Understanding different policy options to correct for negative externalities Carbon dioxide emissions have been link...

    4. Understanding different policy options to correct for negative externalities Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to worsening climate conditions. The following table lists some possible public policies aimed at reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. For each policy listed, identify whether it is a command-and-control policy (regulation), tradable permit system, corrective subsidy, or corrective tax. Command- and- Control Policy Tradable Permit Corrective Corrective Public Policy Subsidy System Tax The government orders every factory to adopt a...

  • Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to global warming. The following table lists some possible public...

    Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to global warming. The following table lists some possible public policies aimed at reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. For each policy listed, identify whether it is a command-and-control policy (regulation), tradable permit system, corrective subsidy, or corrective tax. Command and Tradable Control Permit Corrective Corrective Public Policy The government charges factories $480 for every tonne of carbon dioxide they emit. The government orders every factory to adopt a new technology,...

  • 4. Understanding different policy options to correct for negative externalities policies aimed at reducing the amount...

    4. Understanding different policy options to correct for negative externalities policies aimed at reducing the amount of Carbon dioxide emissions have been linked to global warming. The following table carbon dioxide in the air. For each policy listed, identify whether it is -and-control policy (regulation), permit system, corrective subsidy, or corrective tax. Tradable Permit System Corrective Subsidy corrective Tax Public Policy The government charges factories $110 for every ton of carbon dioxide they emit. The government orders every factory to...

  • C- SOLVE & SHOW THE STEPS: (14 points- 7 pts each) Q# 1 Regulating lower SO,...

    C- SOLVE & SHOW THE STEPS: (14 points- 7 pts each) Q# 1 Regulating lower SO, emissions: Acme and US Electric run coal-burning power plants. Each emits 40 tons of sulfur dioxide per month, total emissions = 80 tons/month. Goal: Reduce SO, emissions 25%, to 60 tons/month Cost of reducing emissions: $100/ton for Acme, $200/ton for USE Policy option 1: Regulation Every firm must cut its emissions 25% (10 tons). Your task: A) Compute the cost to each firm. ANSWER:...

  • Eeon 5:48: Homework 10 Names 1. Two manufacturers in the town of Gamecock emit a total...

    Eeon 5:48: Homework 10 Names 1. Two manufacturers in the town of Gamecock emit a total of 40 tons (20 tons each) of a harmful toxin. The local government wants to limit the total pollution to 20 tons since health studies find no serious deleterious impacts on human health at these levels of pollution. Firm A's marginal cost of abatement is 5X and Firm B's marginal cost of abatement is 2x where X and Xare the tons of toxin abated...

  • Paper factories emit chemicals as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is...

    Paper factories emit chemicals as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of paper production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of chemicals). The following graph shows the daily demand for pollution rights....

  • 7. Correcting for negative externalities - Taxes versus tradable permits Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as...

    7. Correcting for negative externalities - Taxes versus tradable permits Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of power production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of...

  • 7. Correcting for negative externalities - Taxes versus tradablepermits Paper factories emit chemicals as a waste...

    7. Correcting for negative externalities - Taxes versus tradablepermits Paper factories emit chemicals as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of paper production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of chemicals). The...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT