The well-known nationally syndicated columnist David Broder reported the recent findings of two academic political scientists. These scholars found that voters are quite turned off by “negative campaigns” of politicians. Many people went as far as not voting because of this. Nevertheless, the political scientists noted it is futile to urge candidates to stay positive. The damage from staying positive is heaviest when the opponent is attacking. Explain the dilemma in terms of strategic behavior.
Please explain in detail.
This world is a combination of good and bad, where ever you go you can find these kind of people. but the thing is that bad spread fastly and quickly than good. here this is applicable. if you dont like the politicians and their views or their relation with political peopel, then you should vote against them.
instead of doing this if you stop voting, the person who gets more votes he wins. here irrespective of our personal assumptions we should participate in voting. one should respect constitution and the rights provided by our constitution.
we may across many things which are not according to our planing or according to our expectations. we should face them and we should come out with a positive outcome form those. a positive attitude is one, we can observe a small good thing in a huge loss also, then only we can go further.
The well-known nationally syndicated columnist David Broder reported the recent findings of two academic political scientists....