Question

Please help me,

Mesmerizing Marketers (MM) is a marketing company that offers a variety of marketing offerings to its customers. Specifically: MM a $1M, build $500K, build a$250K. amounts MM to the are not is, independently other a customer purchases all aforementioned items together, the total cost is $1.5M. Payment terms are 50 percent consideration due at contract signing, with the remaining 50 percent due over the rest of the development period (25 percent at mid-point, the app is downloaded 500K times or more in the first month, there is a one-time bonus of $250K payable to MM. Stone, a customer, approach MM with the hopes of reinventing its image to a younger customer base. Stone has a verbal agreement with MM that is based on MM’s unsigned quote to Stone on November 30, 20X5, for one TV commercial, one app, and a Facebook page. The agreement creates enforceable rights and obligations pursuant to MM’s customary business practices. None of these items can be redirected by MM to another customer. MM performed a credit check on Stone and has determined that Stone has the intention and ability to pay MM for fulfilling its portion of the contract. Stone is required to pay MM for performance completed to date if Stone cancels the contract with MM for reasons other than MM’s failure to perform under the contract as promised. Stone makes a payment on November 30, 20X5, in the amount of $750K pursuant to the agreement. From the date of the quote, it takes MM six months to develop and produce the TV commercial, two weeks to complete the Facebook page, and three months to complete a fully functioning app. MM does not think that the app will be downloaded 500K times in the first month because Stone’s customer base does not quickly accept newly developed technology. On the basis of its experience with similar technology, MM has determined that it takes over three months for Stone’s users to begin to download its apps. REQUIRED: MM’s CFO is trying to understand the new revenue recognition model and has asked you to explain how MM would account for the above scenario under the new standard. Answer the following circumstances

Case 18-9 – Handout 1 Auditing Mesmerizing Marketers — Risks of Material Misstatement (RoMMs) — Revenue

RoMM Description

1 Contract modifications are not identified and accounted for correctly.

2 All promised goods or services are not properly identified in the contract, or promised goods and services in the contract are not distinct, causing revenue to be recorded in the wrong period.

3 Revenue is inappropriately recognized for consignment sales before a transfer of control has occurred in accordance with the contract terms.

4 The transaction price has not been allocated to performance obligations on a relative stand-alone selling price basis.

5 The fixed consideration identified in the transaction price of the contract is identified at the incorrect amount or does not meet the definition of fixed consideration.

6 Revenue is recognized when a contract (as defined by ASC 60610-25-1) does not exist.

7 The amount of variable consideration is recorded at an incorrect amount.

8 Service-type warranties are not appropriately identified as separate performance obligations.

9 Licensing arrangements when the entity receives consideration from a customer (e.g., in the form of a sales- or usage-based royalty

1. On the basis of the facts stated therein related to the contract between MM and Stone, a customer, what are some risks of material misstatement (RoMMs) that we may identify as part of our audit? Handout 1, the RoMMs matrix, may be used to assist with identifying relevant RoMMs.

2. Tailoring RoMMs to the specific revenue streams and assertions is an important step in designing an audit plan for revenue. Now that you have identified the RoMMs that are applicable to the contract between MM and Stone, how might you tailor the RoMMs that you identified in Activity 1 to the facts presented in this case?

Thank you in advance.

Answer 1