Question

True or False ? A party who promises to complete a job according to the terms...

True or False ?

A party who promises to complete a job according to the terms of a contract signed in the past has not given consideration due to past consideration.

28.       The terms “bilateral” and “unilateral” as applied to contracts are based on:

            a.         The number of parties in a contract.

            b.         The number of attempts made to form a contract.

            c.         What the offeree must do to accept the offer.

            d.         What the offeror must do to accept the offer.

            e.         The number of attempts it took for a contract to be successfully performed.

29.       What was the outcome of the case in the text where Taco Bell Corporation was sued to recover damages for breach of contract?

a.         The court found that an implied-in-fact contract existed and awarded damages to plaintiffs Wrench LLC, Rinks, and Shields.

b.         The court of appeals found that the plaintiffs had stated a proper cause of action against Taco Bell Corporation for breach of contract, reversed the judgment of the district court, and remanded the case for trial.

c.         The court of appeals upheld the district court ruling that granted summary judgment in favor of Taco Bell Corporation.

d.         The court ruled that Wrench LLC, Rinks, and Shields conferred a benefit on Taco Bell Corporation who retained the benefit and thus created a quasi-contract.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

28) The correct option is (e) -: The number of attempts it took for a contract to be successfully performed. Because it depends on what the offeree must do to accept the offeror's offer.

29) The correct option is (b)-: The court of appeals found that the plaintiffs had stated a proper cause of action against Taco Bell Corporation for breach of contract, reversed the judgment of the district court, and remanded the case for trial. Reason-: The U.S. court of Appeals held that Taco Bell understood that if they used the "Psycho Dog" concept, it would have to pay the plaintiffs. They found that there was strong circumstantial evidence that Taco Bell was using the concept, and reversed and remanded the case back for trial.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
True or False ? A party who promises to complete a job according to the terms...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT