Question

 Identifying Rhetorical Features Working in groups or as a whole class, develop responses to the following questions: 1. How does Lopez appeal to logos? What is her main claim and what are her reasons? 2. What does she use for evidence? What ideas would you have to include in a short summary? 3. What appeals to pathos does Lopez make in this argument? How well are these suited to the conservative readers of the National Review? 4. How would you characterize Lopez’s ethos? Does she seem knowledgeable and credible? Does she seem fair to stakeholders in this controversy? 5. Choose an additional focus from the “Questions for Rhetorical Analysis” on pages 155–157 to apply to “Egg Heads.” How does this question expand your understanding of Lopez’s argument? 6. What strikes you as problematic, memorable, or disturbing in this argument?

Answer 1

1.

Lopez charm to logos by stating that” egg donation and procreative technology represent dangerous scientific developments for society as a result of they're probably harmful to the long-range health of egg donors and since they result in an unnatural dehumanizing of human sex.” Her claim is that egg donation and its associated procreative advances have harmful, long reaching consequences for society. therefore, she was light potential damage towards young egg donors. Lopez charm to logos by giving the stories of surrogate mothers and provides applied math knowledge of the period and value of the procedure.

She also, appeals to logos by creating egg donation sound ridiculous, in her descriptions of the method and effects. Another claim is that egg donation negatively changes the manner folks scrutinize family, young women’s bodies, and human lives. She feels it devalues and materializes girls, life, and birth. She additionally feels it is a dishonorable business for each end, heap a lot of hassle than different strategies and everyone altogether is simply not one thing that ought to be promoted. She appeals to logos by stating a range of factual statements in her article to support her claim. i feel that her claim is that the donation of eggs is virtuously wrong.

2.

Lopez charm to logos by giving the stories of surrogate mothers and provides applied math knowledge of the period and value of the procedure. Also, her statement is her opposition of substitute parenting. this may enable a lady World Health Organization cannot have a baby of their own to currently have the prospect.

Another claim is that egg donation negatively changes the manner folks scrutinize family, young women’s bodies, and human lives. She feels it devalues and materializes girls, life, and birth. She additionally feels it is a dishonorable business for each end, heap a lot of hassle than different strategies and everyone altogether is simply not one thing that ought to be promoted.

She uses pathos towards her audience with a typical proof that highlight each logos and attribute to be terribly weak in her argument. An example is that she fails to use proof of the Star criteria that she steered that everyone girl’s area unit young donors as a result of the solely fascinating within the cash facet not thinking long run what could very happen whereas collaborating in somebody life. She additionally attacks the folks by polarizing them into 2 teams that area unit teams” affluent couples eugenically seeking designer babies with preordered special traits and therefore the alternative is feminist career girls.” Lopez additionally makes certain to forever use names and humanizes the folks she is exploitation as proof. She uses what area unit in all probability extreme cases involving the fight for custody and poses the question of World Health Organization the oldsters would be. Some effects of donating eggs, and attainable cases wherever it may bring you a lot of hassle than you'd ordinarily think—like the examples listed.

3.

Lopez appeals to pathos once she shares special experiences like Jaycee the kid that wasn't wished. The story created Pine Tree State feel feeling for the kid. Also, within the starting Lopez will a decent job at painting vivid photos of real folks poising one thing that ought to be lovely done, and dynamical the manner we tend to read things like family. These area unit terribly sturdy appeals to pathos for National Review readers.

4.

Lopez’s attribute has shown attribute at intervals the essay with the analysis of value and period of the procedures which might claim. She would grasp what she is talking concerning. Lopez will appear knowledgeable and credible, she additionally talks concerning each side, wherever she uses proof, and doesn't rush into the meat of her argument but, Lopez attribute appears credible, I may perceive her worrying concerning the method simply unsure if we must always stop it all at once. On the opposite hand, Lopez doesn't appear to be honest in some cases.

5.

Lopez appear to wrote this essay for the likelihood she could have sturdy beliefs that a baby that wasn't placed on the planet naturally mustn't be forced, or AN extreme case could also be a results of a surrogate parent and didn't fancy or settle for the concept of it happening. when doing analysis on the author’s (rhetorical context) I feel her argument could have a touch little bit of a hidden agenda, as a professional life supporter I desire she may not support any world organization authentic kind of parturition whether logical or not.

The sole issue disconcerting issue within the reading was the last case with Mrs. Hect. the fact that there have been fifteen vials of spermatozoon only for Mrs. Hect, which she had to travel to court to urge the remaining twelve vials since she was solely allowed three originally. This simply appears to be a tough discussion for a possible future. Also, the article could be a very little disconcerting, the entire business half, appears contiguous on the unethical and degradation of youngsters. Her wish {to just to only to Pine Tree Satterley simply} entirely do away with the whole method worries me as a result of it appears a touch extreme. This method may truly be serving to some folks.

6.

The argument would be effective if the audience was directed towards the govt. in passage one. when the data wouldn't be too effective as a result of the govt. wouldn't by sympathized by the claims created. This let somebody believe that the second passage serves multiple audiences as a result of the data conferred has relevancy and useful to several folks reaching out on the difficulty of worldwide warming.