12a.
Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Immigration to California from Mexico increased. Soon after, the welfare rolls increased. Therefore, the increased immigration caused the increase in welfare rolls.”(a) Straw man(b) Hasty generalization(c) False cause(d) Untestability(e) Accident
Solution: False cause
Explanation: Since one situation follows another, thus held to be caused because of the other. In the given situation there is a false assumption that the occurrence in question connects with a logical relationship in the event it follows
12a. Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Immigration to California from Mexico increased....
9B. Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. The moon was full on Thursday evening. ii. On Friday morning I overslept. iii. Therefore, the full moon caused me to oversleep.(a) weak analogy(b) Untestability(c) False cause(d) hasty generalization(e) accident 10B. Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Single mothers raising sons have a difficult time controlling them and the sons often end up incarcerated. Single mothers are the cause of the incarceration of their sons.”(a) straw man(b)...
7 Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Supporters of the bill to ban chlordane and related termiticides maintain that it could cause 300,000 cancers in the American population in 70 years. This is like saying that we ought to introduce legislation that bans automobiles on the ground that cars kill people.” (a) straw man(b) red herring(c) Slippery slope(d) weak analogy(e) Hasty generalization
20. Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either God created the universe or it came into being out of nothing.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of composition
Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: "We should not believe President Clinton when he claims not to have had sex with Monica Lewinsky. After all, he's a liar." (a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Equivocation (d) Fallacy of Composition(e) Amphiboly
Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Affirmative action can never be fair or just. You cannot remedy an injustice by committing another.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of composition
For each of these questions, please choose the fallacy (if any) that best characterizes the argument provided in the question. Question 125 (1 point) Stealing is morally wrong. Therefore the refugee shoplifting an apple and bread from a larger multinational supermarket conglomerate to feed his starving, malnourished child when no other source of food is available is morally wrong. Question 125 options: a) Begging the Question. b) Hasty Generalization. c) Accident. d) Amphiboly. e) Division. f) Composition. For each of...
For each of these questions, please choose the fallacy (if any) that best characterizes the argument provided in the question. Question 133 (1 point) You should never allow your son or daughter to drink even a sip of soda or pop. Once you allow him or her a seemingly innocent taste of Coca-Cola or 7-Up or Fanta, that will soon lead to downing whole cans, and then multiple cans. Pretty soon, your child will be drinking a 2-liter or two...
QUESTION 39 INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each argument. Bowser, a German shepherd, had a terrible flea problem. But after one application of FleasOff, Bowser had no fleas for four months. Tango is also a German shepherd with a terrible flca problem. Therefore, FleasOff should also be useful in eliminating Tango's fleas. Da No fallacy. b. False cause. C. Accident. d. Weak analogy e. Hasty generalization
10. Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. A feather is light.ii. What is light cannot be dark.iii. Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of composition
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...