Question

True or False.

In the Paris Agreement, there does not exist a dichotomy between Annex-I and non- Annex-I countries in determining their mitigation pledges.

Answer 1

The given statement is False in nature.

The Paris Agreement is the Convention and brings many countries into a typical reason to attempt driven endeavors to battle environmental change and adjust to the cause, with improved help to help creating nations to do what’s needful. In that capacity, it diagrams another course in the worldwide atmosphere exertion.

The Paris Agreement’s focal point is to fortify the worldwide reaction to the risk of environmental change by keeping a worldwide temperature rise this century well underneath 2 degrees Celsius above levels before industrialization and to seek after endeavors to constrain the temperature increment much further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Furthermore, the understanding expects to fortify the capacity of nations to manage the effects of environmental change. To arrive at these yearning objectives, fitting money related streams, another innovation system and an improved limit building structure will be set up to achieve the goals.

In this agreement the Annex-I countries are  the signatory countries to the Kyoto Protocol that are liable to put a cap on their outflows of Green House Gases and focused on decrease targets–for developed economies. Annex I alludes to the nations distinguished for decrease in the 'United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change' while the Annex B is a balanced rundown of the nations recognized under the later Kyoto Protocol. Extension B nations have their decrease targets officially expressed.

Whereas, Non-Annex I nations are the developing nations, under the Kyoto Protocol. Non-Annex I nations don't have lawfully restricting emission decreasing targets. For example, Solomon Islands is a Non-Annex I nation.