Question

One night, Lucy said to Zehmer, "I bet you wouldn't take $50,000 for your farm." Zehmer...

One night, Lucy said to Zehmer, "I bet you wouldn't take $50,000 for your farm." Zehmer replied, "Yes, I would; you wouldn't give fifty." Throughout the evening, they drank whiskey and talked, repeatedly returning to the subject of the farm. Eventually, Zehmer wrote out an agreement to the effect that he and his wife agreed to sell the farm to Lucy for $50,000.

Lucy pocketed the agreement without Zehmer's protest. The next day, Zehmer remembered the details of the night before, but when Lucy came to take the farm, Zehmer argued that he had been drunk and that the offer had been made in jest.

  • Do Lucy and Zehmer have an enforceable contract?
  • If after taking possession of the farm, Lucy celebrates by getting drunk. Zehmer remains sober while Lucy becomes extremely intoxicated and obviously unaware of what he is doing. Late in the evening, Lucy sells the farm back to Zehmer for $10,000. The next day, Lucy cannot remember the transaction. Could Lucy recover the farm?
  • The courts generally do not weigh the sufficiency of consideration according to the comparative economic value of what is exchanged. Should they? Why or why not? When is consideration legally sufficient?
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Lucy and zehmer don't have an enforceable contract because the two were drunk and did not have mental capacity to enter into a contract at that time, because there was no meeting of minds

Lucy can't sell something which she actually does not possess legally. Since she does not have right on the property, she can't sell it, making the transaction void.

Sufficiency of consideration should be weighed upon economic value terms because cases of  insufficient ( in value) consideration in a sales contract is more likely to have undercover issues behind it. It can be a coercion, a fraudulant deal ( selling fake gold bricks at $1000 per kg) or something which has some hidden considerations, often unlawful. The consideraion is legally sufficient when there is some value or worth in it in return of the deal, though it does not need to be adequate.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
One night, Lucy said to Zehmer, "I bet you wouldn't take $50,000 for your farm." Zehmer...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT