Question

            Chipper Corporation realized $1,000,000 apportionable taxable income from the sales of its products in States X...

            Chipper Corporation realized $1,000,000 apportionable taxable income from the sales of its products in States X and Z. Both states use the same measure of pre-apportionment taxable income. Chipper’s activities establish nexus for income tax purposes only in Z, the state of its incorporation. Chipper’s sales, payroll, and property among the states include the following.

                        State X           State Z            Totals

Sales          $1,000,000      $2,000,000      $3,000,000

Property                    0        2,300,000        2,300,000

Payroll                      0        1,900,000        1,900,000

X utilizes a sales-only factor in its three-factor apportionment formula. How much of Chipper’s apportionable income is taxed by X?

a.         $0

b.         $333,333

c.         $500,000

d.         $1,000,000

e.         $111,111

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Solution: $0

Explanation: The business would not be subject to taxation in a state until nexus is established; thus the Chipper’s apportionable income that is taxed by X equals $0

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
            Chipper Corporation realized $1,000,000 apportionable taxable income from the sales of its products in States X...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • José Corporation realized $900,000 taxable income from the sales of its products in States X and...

    José Corporation realized $900,000 taxable income from the sales of its products in States X and Z. José’s activities in both states establish nexus for income tax purposes. José’s sales, payroll, and property among the states include the following. State X State Z Totals Sales $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $2,500,000 Property 500,000 –0– 500,000 Payroll 2,000,000 –0– 2,000,000 ​ X utilizes an equally weighted three-factor apportionment formula. How much of José’s taxable income is apportioned to X? a. $900,000 b. $120,000 c....

  • Castle Corporation conducts business in States 1, 2, and 3. Castle’s $630,000 taxable income consists of...

    Castle Corporation conducts business in States 1, 2, and 3. Castle’s $630,000 taxable income consists of $555,000 apportionable income and $75,000 allocable income generated from transactions conducted in State 3. Castle’s sales, property, and payroll are evenly divided among the three states, and the states all employ a three-equal-factors apportionment formula. Determine how much of Castle’s income is taxable in each of the following states. a. State 1: $ _________ b. State 2: $ _________ c. State 3: $ _________

  • Roger Corporation operates in two states, as indicated below. This year’s operations generated $400,000 of apportionable...

    Roger Corporation operates in two states, as indicated below. This year’s operations generated $400,000 of apportionable income. Compare Roger’s State A taxable income assuming that state A apportions income based on a: Three-factor formula, equally weighted Three-factor formula, with double -weighted sales factor. Sales factor only. State A State B Total Sales $ 800,000 $ 200,000 $ Property $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ Payroll $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,000,000 600,000 250,000

  • General Corporation is taxable in a number of states. This year, General made a $100,000 sale...

    General Corporation is taxable in a number of states. This year, General made a $100,000 sale from its A headquarters to an agency of the U.S. government. State A applies a throwback rule. In which state(s) will the sale be included in the sales factor numerator? a. $0 in A. b. $50,000 in A, with the balance exempted from other states’ sales factors under the Colgate doctrine. c. $100,000 in A. d. In all of the states, according to the...

  • Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bound...

    Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: Domicile State Sharon Inc. State X (throwback) Carol Corp. State Y (throwback) Josey Corp. State Z (nonthrowback) Janice Corp. State Z (nonthrowback) Dividend income $ 1,000 $ 200 $ 300 $ 500 Business...

  • 3 Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) Part 3 of 4...

    3 Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) Part 3 of 4 Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: 2.5 points eBook De Domicile State Dividend income Business income Sales : State x State Y State...

  • Provide tax preparation by computing XYZ's apportionment factors for all three states. For at least one...

    Provide tax preparation by computing XYZ's apportionment factors for all three states. For at least one of the states (not all three), prepare the apportionment form using the income tax return forms for the current tax year. For example, use Form 120 for Arizona, Form K-120 for Kansas, or Form 512 for Oklahoma. You are only required to complete the apportionment schedule, not the entire tax return. Assume XYZ generates $100,200,000 of total revenue. State Apportionment Use this resource to...

  • a. Calculate the State X apportionment factor for Sharon Inc., Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice...

    a. Calculate the State X apportionment factor for Sharon Inc., Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp. b. Calculate the business income apportioned to State X. c. Calculate the taxable income for State X for each company. d. Determine the tax liability for State X for the entire group. Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Cor., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which...

  • Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp.,...

    Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: Compute the following for State X assuming a tax rate of 15 percent. (Use an equally weighted three-factor apportionment. Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places. Round other answers to the nearest...

  • Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Jan...

    Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: Compute the following for State X assuming a tax rate of 15 percent. (Use an equally weighted three-factor apportionment. Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places. Round other answers to the nearest...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT