A 2000 kg Cadillac had just started its march from a stop sign when it was struck from behind by a 1000 kg Volkswagen. The bumpers locked and the two cars slid together until they stopped. Officer Tom, responding to the accident, measured that skid marks were 3.0 m long. The driver also testified that the speed of the Cadillac just before the impact was 5.0 m / s. Officer Tom accused the Volkswagen of driving recklessly. Should the Volkswagen driver also be accused of exceeding the speed limit of 50 km / h? The judge calls him as an "expert witness" to analyze the evidence. What is your conclusion?
Investigate and raise your arguments, based on collisions in one
dimension.
A 2000 kg Cadillac had just started its march from a stop sign when it was...
The stoplight had just changed and a 2000 kg Cadillac had entered the intersection, heading north at 2.4 m/s, when it was struck by a 1200 kg eastbound Volkswagen. The cars stuck together and slid to a halt, leaving skid marks angled 35° north of east. Part A - How fast was the Volkswagen going just before the impact? Express your answer to two significant figures. IVO AL * O ? Submit Request Answer
If you could please show the formulas used I would really appreciate it! You are called as an expert witness to analyze the following auto accident: Car B, of mass 1900 kg, was stopped at a red light when it was hit from behind by car A, of mass 1500 kg. The cars locked bumpers during the collision and slid to a slop with brakes locked on all wheels. Measurements of the skid marks left by the tires showed them...