Question

I need guidance on how to write What does biblical "leadership" look like. thanks

Answer 1

"Leadership" by and large is a thought that is by all accounts getting a ton of advancement nowadays. Regardless of whether I'm at chapel, in a book shop, or at work, it appears the affirmation that "everyone should be a leader" is continually being pushed. I don't know whether this is substantial or not. However, whichever way I can't help suspecting that the entire idea of "leadership" has been raised to the dimension of close excessive admiration. Does Scripture truly instruct that everybody ought to endeavor to be a "leader"?

The Gospel can be summed up in the platitude that Jesus Christ has "flipped around the world" (Acts 17:6). As indicated by everything He had to state regarding the matter, the kingdom of God is an upside down spot where the first are last and the last are first (Matthew 19:30). It's where the poor are rich (Luke 1:53), the silly astute (I Corinthians 1:25), and the frail solid (II Corinthians 12:9). Little youngsters and hobos are rulers and masters in this bizarre new world (Luke 9:48, 16:25). Demise and disappointment are the ways to triumph (Matthew 16:25).
It doesn't take a virtuoso to see this has some really extreme ramifications for our ordinary human suppositions about "leadership." The devotees ran smack into these suggestions on at any rate two vital events. Once, while strolling along the street, they fell into a contention "concerning which one of them would be most prominent" in the kingdom of paradise. Jesus' reaction? He stood a little kid in their middle and stated, "Whoever gets this little kid in My name gets Me; and whoever gets Me gets Him who sent Me. For he who is least among all of you will be incredible" (Luke 9:48).
Some other time, the spouse of Zebedee came to Christ looking for abnormal state arrangements for her two children, James and John, in the coming Messianic kingdom. In answer, the Lord said (in addition to other things), "You realize that the leaders of the Gentiles reign over them, and the individuals who are incredible exercise expert over them. However it will not be so among you; yet whoever wants to wind up extraordinary among you, let him be your hireling. Furthermore, whoever wants to be first among you, let him be your slave" (Matthew 20:25-27).
These words sound progressive to us today. They had a similar impact on Jesus' peers. But then they weren't generally bringing anything new into the surge of scriptural disclosure. Over and over the journalists of the Old Testament accounts had made a similar point. In story after story they exhibited that the reluctant leader is most likely the most ideally equipped contender for the activity. The individual most appropriate to practice specialist is presumably the person who needs it least.
Take Moses for instance. He was loaded up with celestial power and intelligence as long as he questioned his very own capacity (Exodus 4:10). Be that as it may, he committed huge errors when he enabled himself to move toward becoming diverted with his very own feeling significance (Numbers 20:8-12). A similar example is clear in the lives of Gideon (Judges 6:15), Saul (I Samuel 10:21, 22), Elijah (I Kings 19:10), and (Jeremiah 1:6). What's more, that is to give some examples.
Plainly, the case that everyone should be a leader or that everyone should want to be a leader is conflicting with the Spirit of Christ's kingdom. The scriptural view may be better spoken to by Thomas Jefferson's perception that "At whatever point a man has gotten an eyeful of an aching eye on [public office], a rottenness starts in his direct.
For a considerable length of time this thought was reflected in a convention of the congregation. As an issue of formal convention, candidates to the workplace of priest should "decay" the arrangement by rehashing the Latin phrase nolo episcopari: "I don't wish to turn into a diocesan." After some time this turned out to be only an unfilled equation. In any case, it protected that lone the man equipped for rehashing these words and really meaning them was truly fit for the assignment of shepherding God's kin.
For what reason should this be valid? We'd recommend that there are two reasons.
The first is simple humility. The hesitant leader is a decent leader since he questions himself. The presumptuous leader, on the other hand – as on account of Moses – easily falls prey to inconsiderateness and welcomes catastrophe for his kin.
The second reason is increasingly unobtrusive. A genuine leader shies from his calling since he knows there's nothing in it for him. He comprehends that the dangers, the tensions, and the restless evenings will be endured notfor the purpose of individual increase, however to help another person. As it were, he understands that certifiable leadership involves administration and generosity. That is dependably somewhat awkward.

Thanks and don't forget to thumbs up.....