In product liability cases the plaintiff must establish that the product was defective. What are the 4 types of defects that can result in a company being held responsible for injuries under the legal theory of product liability?
To elaborate on the first statement, in a product liability case the plaintiff must establish that a product caused a physical injury and that injury is because of a product's defect, and not a result of misuse/ wrong usage by the user.
Now that the we have established the proof requirements on the plaintiff's part in a product liability case, the case can be based on defects that could be broadly classified into three types,not four. The defect types are as follows,
1) Design defects: These are the inherent defects present in the contextual definition of the product, which would have existed even before the manufacturing started. These defects could be a poorly defined use case, or weak functional design or even the product's inherent cons outweighing their intended purpose and many such.
2) Manufacturing defect: These are defects that emanated in the shop floor/ assembly line. These defects won't be prevalent across all produced product, but rather just the affected batch.
3) Marketing defect: These are not very significant or irreversible defects. These are just caused because of lack of communication/ miscommunication on the acceptable and safe usage of the product from the producer to it's intended user.
In product liability cases the plaintiff must establish that the product was defective. What are the...
The plaintiff was injured by a defective intravenous catheter. In order to win a product liability case, what must the plaintiff prove first? a. The intravenous catheter was sold to him. b. The intravenous catheter was used incorrectly. c. The intravenous catheter was defective. d. The hospital purchases the poorly manufactured intravenous catheters.
What must a plaintiff establish to support a claim of age discrimination under the ADEA? Must the plaintiff demonstrate that he or she was replaced by someone under the age of 40? Explain.
Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, in order to establish the liability of an auditor who prepared a defective registration statement, a plaintiff must prove that: a. he/she purchased securities issued pursuant to the defective registration statement. b. the auditor acted with scienter in preparing the registration statement. c. the auditor was negligent in preparing the registration statement. d. he/she was in privity of contract with the auditor.
Risk insurance management: Liability Risk. I did the first question but need the rest done Liability Risk - Chap 19 6. What can you recommend to best overcome these defects? 1. List and explain each of the four elements of negligence identified in the chapter. The existence of a legal duty to the plaintiff: requires that the defendant owe a legal duty to the plaintiff The defendant breached that duty: Whether the defendant's actions hurt the plaintiff The plaintiff was...
A plaintiff asserting a violation of the Sec 1 of the Sherman Act: A. must establish an agreement or some concerted action by the defendants. B. is entitled to treble damages if he prevails. C. can recover if he suffered a direct injury as a result of the defendant's conduct. D. All of the above. E. Answers A and B only.
Item (d) relates to what a plaintiff who purchased securities must prove in a civil liability suit against a CPA. d. The plaintiff security purchaser must prove privity with the CPA. Multiple Choice A)Only applies to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. B)Only applies to Section 11 of the 1933 Securities Act. C)Applies to neither of the acts.
37) "But for causation refers to which of the following? A) Proximate cause. B) Constructive cause. C) Actual cause. D) Legal cause. E) Significant cause. 38) Louisa decides to go on a zip line adventure. She signs a contract before she begins to go on the zip line, which says that she assumes the risks of accident or injury. While walking up the steps to grab the zip line, Louisa falls down due to a broken handrail on the stairs....
A merchant seller who would like to exclude the warranty of merchantability can do so by doing which of the following? The merchant can sell the goods "As is." The merchant can sell the goods With All Faults." The merchant can write conspicuously that the warranty of MERCHANTABILITY is excluded, All of the above QUESTION 4 1 po In order to establish strict liability, the plaintiff must prove that: The seller sells normally the kind of product that was defective....
Questions 1-5 pertain to the Golden v. McCurry (1980). In this legal dispute, the plaintiff Golden sues McCurry for injuries sustained as a result of McCurry hitting Golden with his automobile while Golden was crossing the highway. Suppose that Golden demands $10,000 in compensation for medical bills and foregone wages. Question 1 What elements need to be present in order for the injury to constitute a tort under the doctrine of simple negligence? Note that you need to select ALL...
A large company owns 4 manufacturing plants. At each of the 4 plants, they collected a sample of 100 products and for each product, they determined whether or not the product was defective. The company would like to know if the rate of defects significantly differs across the 4 manufacturing plants. They can use ANOVA to test their hypothesis. True False