a) If Vancouver wins Betty's wealth = $400+$1500 = $1900 (400 from the $1000 in savings and $1500 from sales)
If Vancouver loses Betty's wealth = $400 (as she will lose all the money she made from her investment)
Her utitlity function is given by : u(M) = M (where we assume M to be Betty's wealth)
Thus Betty's expected utility if Vancouver has a 0.6 chance of winning is :
EU = 0.6*u(1900) + 0.4*u(400)
= 0.6*1900 + 0.4*400
= 1300
Her utility initially was u($1000) = 1000
Since 1300>1000, her expected utility from making as investment is greater than utility by not maing the investment thus she will make the investment.
b) Certainty equivalent is the amount of money with certainty that Betty would accept such that she would yield the same utility as making the risky investment.
Certainity equivalent that Betty would accept = CE = u-1(1300) = $1300
c) Her expected utility from not having having insurance is EU(no insurance) = EU($1300) = 1300
Let F be the max insurance premium she is willing to pay
Her expected utility if she pays the insurance premium F is:
EU(insurance) = E($1500-F) = 1500 - F
To find max value Betty will be willing to pay,
EU(insurance) = EU(no insurance)
1500-F = 1300
F = $200
Thus Betty will pay a maximum of $200 for the insurance policy.
For Betty's friend, since he is risk neutral, his utility function can be assumed to be EU(M) = M
His expected utility if he offers this insurance policy will therefore be
= EU = 0.4*F + 0.6*(F-1500)
= 0.4*200 + 0.6*(200-1500)
= -700
Thus he will have a negative expected utility if he is risk neutral and thus he will lose by this venture
Betty Bat loves the Vancouver Canucks. She has followed their exploits since she was five years...