Question

The legal doctrine of remittitur allows the: a. jury to reduce the damages requested by the...

The legal doctrine of remittitur allows the:

a. jury to reduce the damages requested by the plaintive based on his/her own contribution to the incident
b. jury to increase the damages requested by the plaintive based on the egregious nature of the incident
c. judge to reduce the jury's verdict based on sympathetic reaction to wrong committed
d. judge to reduce the arbitrators award based on bias of the arbitrator
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

The answer is option a

A recommendation is a judge's decision that reduces the amount of damages received in a civil case by a jury. This is typically due to the amount received exceeding the amount demanded. The word is sometimes used to reduce the damages awarded even if the amount awarded does not exceed the amount sought, but is considered excessive otherwise. The high profile file-sharing court case Capitol v. Thomas is an example of the latter. If the motion is granted, the complainant may either accept the reduced verdict or submit to a new trial for damages

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
The legal doctrine of remittitur allows the: a. jury to reduce the damages requested by the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A jury awards a plaintiff $200,000 in damages in a sexual harassment case, a federal district...

    A jury awards a plaintiff $200,000 in damages in a sexual harassment case, a federal district court judge reduced the award to $45,000. The judge did so because at the time of the jury's verdict, the plaintiff's employer had twenty-five employees, and Title VII caps damages for employers with no more that 100 employees at a maximum of $50,000. However, three years earlier, when the harassment occurred, the employer had 235 employees. Was the judge correct in capping damages awarded...

  • 33 and 34 plz QUESTION 33 The contributory negligence defense allows a defendant to prevent the judge from applyin...

    33 and 34 plz QUESTION 33 The contributory negligence defense allows a defendant to prevent the judge from applying ratio decidendi. Oabsolutely bar a plaintiff from recovery, if the plaintiff contributed to his/her own injury O disqualify a plaintiff from petitioning for a writ of ceriorari O request for rescission as a O reduce damages awarded a plaintiff who has played a role in causing his/her injury legal remedy QUESTION 34 The courts have generally defined just compensation in terms...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

  • McDonald's Coffee Case Overview The re is a lot of hype about the McDonalds' scalding coffee...

    McDonald's Coffee Case Overview The re is a lot of hype about the McDonalds' scalding coffee case. No one is in favor of frivolous cases of outlandish results; however, it is important to understand some points that were not reported in most of the stories about the case. McDonald's coffee was not only hot; it was scalding - capable of almost instantaneous destruction of skin, flesh and muscle. Here's the whole story Stella Liebeck of Albuquerque, New Mexico, was in...

  • Please see attached Pictures. This is a homework assignment for Legal environment of Business that i...

    Please see attached Pictures. This is a homework assignment for Legal environment of Business that i need help solving. Stacy mails Jennifer an offer to sell Jennifer 43 bags of rice for $107.00. Jennifer replies to Stacy by mail, stating, " agree to pay $105.75 for 43 bags of rice. Neither Stacy nor Jennifer are merchants. What is the status of Stacy's offer. 1. a. Jennifer has accepted it b. Jenifer has rejected it and counteroffered c, Jennifer has breached...

  • Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring...

    Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring Twenties, the schemes and scams of flimflam artists and confidence men were legendary. The absence of a strong regulatory system at the federal level to police the securities markets—the Securities and Exchange Commission was not established until 1934—aided, if not encouraged, financial frauds of all types. In all likelihood, the majority of individuals involved in business during the 1920s were scrupulously honest. Nevertheless, the...

  • Read the following case: Answer the questions accordingly: PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE EEOC v. Management...

    Read the following case: Answer the questions accordingly: PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine 666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012) OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE YOUNG: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") brought this action on behalf of two serv- ers, Katrina Shisler and Michelle Powell, who were em- ployed at an International House of Pancakes franchise in Racine, Wisconsin (the "Racine IHOP"), alleging that the servers were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of...

  • 1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in...

    1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in cases having incompetent parties. B) It permits a court to order enforcement of a contract that lacks consideration. C) It allows for a party to claim goods that were never paid for. D) It is invoked in cases that involve a promissory note. 2. Which of the following is true for a minor under the infancy doctrine? A) A minor is bound to the...

  • TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page...

    TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT