Consider two utilities X and Y, which are subject to pollution control regulation. They try to maximize their own profit. ● The price for electricity generation received by each utility is $100/MWh. ● Assume that each firm produces 1 MWh of power regardless of regulation. ● Each utility separately emits 10.0 lbs of NOx/MWh in the absence of regulation. ● The regulator wishes to limit total emissions to 14.0 lbs of NOx/MWh. ○ In other words, the goal is total abatement of 6.0 lbs of NOx/MWh ( because 10 + 10 - 14 = 6). ● Utility X has a total abatement cost of TACx( ax) = 3*ax2 and marginal abatement cost of MACx( ax) = 6*ax. 2 ● Utility Y has a total abatement cost of TACy( ay) = 8*ay and marginal abatement cost of MACy( ay) = 16*ay. Keep in mind that profit is equal to total revenue minus total cost. 1) Both firms are under a uniform standard, where they evenly split the total abatement. For each firm, calculate: a) Abatement (ax and ay) b) MAC for the last unit of abatement c) Total profits.
a. Under the uniform standard, both the firms X and Y now need
to abate 3 lbs of NO/MWh. Thus, the ax or the abatement by utility
X is 6/2 or 3 lbs and similarly, utility Y will also abate 3 lbs of
NO/MWh.
b. The marginal abatement cost for the last unit or from the 5th
unit of abatement for Firm X is 6(3)=$18 while the marginal
abatement cost from last or 5th unit of abatement for firm Y is
16*3=$48
c. total profits are revenue fo botn the firms mium the total costs of abatement by both the firms.
Total abatement cost of firm X is=3(3)^2=3*9=$27
Total abatement cost of firm Y is=8(3)^2=8*9=$72 (Please note that the formula for TACy is misprinted as it should be 8*ay^2)
Total profits= Revenue of firm X+Revenue of firm Y-TAC of X-TAC of Y=(100*1)+(100*1)-(27)-(72)=$101 (where revenue is price times the quantity produced).
Consider two utilities X and Y, which are subject to pollution control regulation. They try to...
Two thermic power plants have the following marginal and total cost of abatement of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. When faced with no restrictions each of them emits maximum 100 ppm (parts per million) of NOx. Firm 1: MAC1=5 A1 TAC1=2.5 (A1)^2 Firm 2: MAC2 = 10 A2 TAC2= 5(A2)^2 (8 pts) The EPA finds the total NOx emissions of 200 ppm too much and seeks for improvement in air quality by specifying the reduction of 40% in total emissions from...
There are two firms producing cement. Each produces 20 units of pollution, and each has the ability to reduce pollution (abate) their emissions by operating some machine. The marginal damage of each unit of pollution to society is $3 (i.e., the marginal benefit of each unit of abatement is $3). The total cost of firm 1 is where denotes the amount of abatement of firm 1. The total cost of firm 2 is where denotes the amount of abatement of...
Question 3 (11 points) liability Q Consider a firm, which is polluting the water near Good Grief, Idaho. The marginal damage cost of this pollution is given by; MDC - - 6 + 0.75 e where e is the level of emissions. The marginal abatement costs are; MAC - 200 - 2 e. (a) Determine the optimal level of emissions. (b) Draw a diagram showing the MAC, MDC and the optimal level of emissions. On this diagram show the total...
1. Suppose an economy consisting of two factories and two neighbours in which these factories are all polluters with e is the quantity of emissions generated by each factory. Firm 1 has an abatement cost function of AC (e) = 0.5e 2 -5e while the abatement cost for Firm 2 is AC (e)= e 2 – 8e. Marginal damage for each consumer is defined by MD(e) = e, where e here is the total amount of emissions the consumer is...
Consider a pulp mill that emits air and water pollution emissions (E) that impose negative external costs (damages) onto society. The aggregate marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) curves have been estimated follows: MAC = 800 − 20E MD = 20E a. On a diagram, plot the MAC and MD curves. Be sure to label the curves, calculate the vertical intercept and horizontal intercepts of the MAC line, and the intersection point of the two lines. Show all...
5. Suppose that there is an industry with two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost curves as follows MAC1 1,000 2E1 MAC2 500 E2 E1 and E2 represent the respective emissions of each firm in tonnes [3] (a) Solve for initial emissions for each fim and rewrite both of the MAC equations as functions of abatement [6] (b) Derive the Industry MAC curve for this industry . Briefly explain each of the steps you take to find the...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2 =10−E2. Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 12 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint: This will be a...
Consider two polluters (A and B) emitting a harmful chemical into the air. Let TAC- Total Abatement Cost, MAC-Marginal Abatement Cost, and e emission. A and B may be regulated for a standard of es 20 via the equiproportionate approach (10 "e" each) or the equimarginal approach (MACA MACB ) Their respective MAC curves are: MACA-20-ea and MACB l 5-0.75e. (a) Compute TAC subject to the equiproportionate approach. (b) Find x and compute TAC subject to the equimarginal approach. (c)...
Suppose that two firms, X and Y, face the following abatement costs: MACX = 1.2AX, MACY = 0.3AY TACX = 0.6AX2 TACY = 0.15AY2 Further assume that the combined abatement standard is 40 units for both firms. Based on the model given, the cost-effective solution would arise if each firm abates 20 units of pollution firm X abates 8 units, and firm Y abates 32 units firm Y does all the abating because its MAC is lower firm X abates 24...