A. Utilitraian Approach
The Utilitarian Approach assesses an action in terms of its consequences or outcomes; i.e., the net benefits and costs to all stakeholders on an individual level
Advantages
1.It presents a strong sense of purpose.
2.It promotes a world with more happiness.
3.It articulates the basic human nature of feelings.
4.It helps with making tough decisions.
Disadvantages
1.It is disputable on whether who can decide good or bad.
2.It prevents us to make speculations about the future.
3.It promotes favoritism.
4. It can lead to missed opportunities.
B.Moral rights Approach
The moral rights approach asserts that human beings have
fundamental rights and liberties that cannot be taken away by an
individual’s decision.
Advantages
1.The right of free consent.
2.The right to privacy.
3.The right of freedom of conscience.
4.The right of free speech.
C.Practical Approach
PracticalApproach is something other people had made a theory about in past that was applied it and was worked. The people simply copy them as they know that the practical approach is verified. But in the process of doing so, the people end up doing something they don't like or enjoy doing
Advantages
1.Greater impression:
2.Non-reliance on rote work
3.Real-life experience
4.Higher engagement makes for easier learning
Disadvantages
1.For a students life ,first come theoretical than practical approach
2.For any working person practical approach is more important, but for some theoretical approach is also necessray
3.If you are any type of philosopher then therotical approach is preferred
what are the advantages and disadvantages of a utilitarian approach, moral-rights approach and practical approach ? ical Decision-making Approal ent, 8e, 2013-18. Richard L. Daft/Dorothy Marcic, p...