r work
> x=c(920,935,916,920,940,933,925,940,933,927)
> y=c(917,934,924,921,945,931,919,943,932,935)
> a=lm(y~x)
> a
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) x
10.7575 0.9897
> anova(a)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: y
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
x 1 647.37 647.37 25.956 0.000936 ***
Residuals 8 199.53 24.94
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
> summary(a)
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-7.240 -2.908 -1.214 3.414 6.780
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 10.7575 180.4583 0.060 0.953927
x 0.9897 0.1943 5.095 0.000936 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’
1
Residual standard error: 4.994 on 8 degrees of
freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.7644, Adjusted R-squared:
0.7349
F-statistic: 25.96 on 1 and 8 DF, p-value: 0.000936
>
answers:
a)
b)
yes the simple linear regression model is significant.as p value is
c)
YES there is evidence that both the devices produces equivalent temperature measurements.
Show work please. can be used for produced from an IR device. The indirect is method is preferable because the thermocouples are eventually destroyed by the solution. Consider the following 10 mea...
. Your answer is partially correct. Two different methods can be used for measuring the temperature of the solution of a Hall cell used in aluminum smelting, a thermocouple implanted in the cell and an indirect measurement produced from an IR device. The indirect method is preferable because the thermocouples are eventually destroyed by the solution. Consider the following 10 measurements: Thermocouple, x 920935 916 920 940|939|925 940|933 927|| 915|934|924|921|945|927|919943|932|935 IR. Y (a) Fit a simple linear regression model to...