b. In rightmost derivation, we always expand the rightmost non-terminal first.
Now suppose a string has been generated by some context-free grammar, then that string must have a parse tree which will produce the string from the starting non-terminal S by applying a series of productions.
Now to produce the same string by using rightmost derivation, we can simply follow the production rule in the parse tree in following way :-
1. Start from the root node of parse tree( non-terminal S) and follow the production in the depth first search manner with rightmost non-terminal in the production tree is selected as the next node to explore in depth first search.
2. If we follow the production in depth first search manner with rightmost non-terminal in the children node is selected as the next node to explore in the parse tree then node that the sequence of production rule explored by depth first search in this manner is rightmost derivation method in which we expand the right-most non-terminal first and this will generate the same string.
Hence there always exist rightmost derivation for every string in a context - free grammar.
Please comment for any clarification.
please do B) for me a. Give the definition of a rightmost derivation of a context free grammar G b. Show that any string that can be generated by any context free grammer G can be generated by a r...
1. Consider the following grammar A - aB B-Sb (a) Show a derivation tree for the string aabbbb using the grammar. (b) Give an English description of the language generated by the grammar 2. Let G be the grammar below: S-ASB ab | SS (a) Show that G is ambiguous. (b) Construct an unambiguous grammar equivalent to G. 3. Find a context free grammar for the language L3- fa"b"c+m :n,m21) 4. Find a context free grammar for the language L4...
4. Consider the following context-free grammar S SSSS a (a) Show how the string aa+a* can be generated by this grammar (b) What language does this grammar generate? Explain
Given the following ambiguous context free grammar (3x20) 1. (a) Explain why the grammar is ambiguous (b) Find an equivalent unambiguous context-free grammar. (c) Give the unique leftmost derivation and derivation tree for the string s generated from the unambiguous grammar above. 2. Construct non-deterministic pushdown automata to accept the following language (20) 3. Convert the following CFG into an cquivalent CFG in Chomsky Normal Form (CNF) (20)-
Q1: Given the below language and context free gramma:, a. Show that the grammar is ambiguous using the string ( abc) by using substitutions. b. Then design a push down automata that recognizes the language. C. Then show the tracing of (abc, abbccc) using the push down automata. d. Then Show which two simple languages create the greaterlanguage. Give set builder notation for each language. e. Then produce Chomsky normal form for the grammar. The following context-free language is inherently...
Consider the following context-free grammar with terminals {a, b, c, d} and start symbol S. S → W | X | Y | Z W → AW D | X | Y | Z X → BXD | Z Y → AY C | Z Z → BZC | ε A → a B → b C → c D → d (a) Give a derivation tree with input string: aaaabccddd (b) What language does this CFG recognize? Give a...
3 points) Question Three Consider the context-free grammar S >SS+1 SS 1a and the string aa Give a leftmost derivation for the string. 3 points) (4 poiots) (5 points) (3 points) sECTION IWOLAttcmpt.any 3.(or 2) questions from this.scction Suppose we have two tokens: (1) the keyword if, and (2) id-entifiers, which are strings of letters other than if. Show the DFA for these tokens. Give a nightmost derivation for the string. Give a parse tree for the string i) Is...
Give a context-free grammar for the following language: L1 = {ww^R c^n : w ∈ {a, b}*, n >= 0}, i.e each string consists of a string w containing a’s and b’s, followed by the reverse of w, followed by 0 or more c’s.
1. Show that the following languages are context-free. You can do this by writing a context free grammar or a PDA, or you can use the closure theorems for context-free languages. For example, you could show that L is the union of two simpler context-free languages. (b) L {0, 1}* - {0"1" :n z 0}
1. Show that the following languages are context-free. You can do this by writing a context free grammar or a PDA, or you can use the closure theorems for context-free languages. For example, you could show that L is the union of two simpler context-free languages. (d) L = {0, 1}* - L1, where L1 is the language {1010010001…10n-110n1 : n n ≥ 1}.
Consider the context-free grammar G = (V, T, S, P) where V = {S}, T = {0, 1, 2, +, *} and with productions S -> S + S | S * S | 0 | 1 | 2 a) Show that the grammar is ambiguous b) Give an equivalent unambiguous grammar.