Using the given E-views output
(a) The estimated consumption function is
Y = 864.9599+0.766010X
Where Y is the dependent variable Consumption C : RCONNA
X is the independent variable RGDPNA
The slope coefficient(independent variable regressor coefficient) 0.766010 which is highly significant since it’s t ratio value is 34.32526 with p value is 0.
The intercept coefficient 864.9599 is insignificant since it’s t ratio value is 0.5537 with p value is 0.5854 which is greater than the levels of significance 0.01, 0.05 and even 0.1.
R2 = 0.98167 and Adjusted R2 = 0.980837 which nearly 98% of variation in Y occurs due to X, that is there exists a very strong relationship between Y and X.
F statistic value = 1178.224 with p value as 0 Which indicates that the above linear regression relationship between Y and X is highly significant.
Then it indicates that there is a significant influence of independent variable X on the dependent variable Y.
Durbin Watson statistic is 0.603838 which is less than 2 and indicates that there is a positive autocorrelation in the series.
(b) The null hypothesis: RGDPNA has a unit root test.
To test the above null hypothesis, the ADF (Augmented Dicky-Fuller ) test statistic has got p value 1 which is greater than the level of significance 0.01, then the null hypothesis is accepted. That is the independent variable X: RGDPNA has a unit root test.
The null hypothesis: RCONNA has a unit root test.
To test the above null hypothesis, the ADF (Augmented Dicky-Fuller ) test statistic has got p value 0.9274 which is greater than the level of significance 0.01, then the null hypothesis is accepted. That is the dependent variable Y: RCONNA has a unit root test.
Therefore both Y and X series have unit root in the data.
(c) We may suspect that the above regression equation in (a) is spurious because
The null hypothesis: Series are not cointegrated
To test the above null hypothesis with the dependent variable Y:C: RCONNA has the p value 0.0982 for the test statistic is greater than the level of significance 0.01, then we accept the null hypothesis and conclude that the Series are not cointegrated.
But we may consider the regression equation is spurious since the p value 0.0982 is just above 0.05 but below 0.1 level of significance. That is at more than or equal to 0.1 levels of significance, the above null hypothesis is rejected and we say that he Series are cointegrated. Also the independent variable X is significantly influencing the dependent variable Y as the t value of regression coefficient of X is significant and R2 value adjusted R2 value are very high and are greater than Durbin-Watson statstic which can be obseved in (a). Moreover X and Y have unit root, that is the series in non-stationery which can be observed in (b).
Use the EViews Output in the appendix. (36 points) a) Determine the estimated consumption function from the EViews output. [Also provide R'. t-ratios and the F-statistic and the correspondi...
part B & C. the results of the unit root test are goven Homework 7 12.4 The data file oil.dat contains 88 annual observations on the price of oil (in 1967 constant dollars) for the period 1883-1970. (a) Plot the data. Do the data look stationary, or nonstationary? (b) Use a unit root test to demonstrate that the series is stationary (c) What do you conclude about the order of integration of this series? Capture Series: OIL Workfile: OI::oil View...
Consider time series yt , defined as the daily percentage change in SP500 index. A researcher estimated the following model: (a) There is one partial autocorrelation coefficient that you can find from the estimation result. What is the value of it? What is order (k ) of it? (b) Test the null hypothesis that the partial autocorrelation coefficient that you have is zero against the alternative that it is not zero. Dependent Variable: GROWTH Method: Least Squares Date: 03/08/15 Time:...
Two large US corporations, General Electric and Westinghouse, compete with each other and produce many similar products. In order to investigate whether they have similar investment strategies, we estimate the following model using pooled time series data for the period 1935 to 1954 for the two firms: INV, = B.+B_DV + B:Vi+B4DV*V: + BsK+B DV*K: +44 (1) where INV - gross investment in plant and equipment V-value of the firm = value of common and preferred stock K = stock...
1. Autocorrelation test Given the model Consumption, = a + B.Year + B Disposible Income, +E, and the estimated model: Model 1: OLS, using observations 1959-1995 (T = 37) Dependent variable: c t-ratio p-value const time Disposable Income Coefficient Std. Error 2707.84 385.254 80.9122 13.6539 0.508123 0.0460444 Mean dependent var Sum squared resid R-squared F(2, 34) Log-likelihood Schwarz criterion rho 11328.65 304975.4 0.998650 12577.63 -219.3165 449.4657 0.551018 S.D. dependent var S.E. of regression Adjusted R-squared P-value(F) Akaike criterion Hannan-Quinn Durbin-Watson...