(4) Let (Ω,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω → R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: ·f is measu...
(4) Let (Q,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω-> R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: f is measurable . f-(I) E A for any open interval I CR .f-(A) E A for any open set ACR. . f-(A) E A for any Borel set ACR.
(4) Let (Q,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω-> R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: f is measurable . f-(I) E A for any open...
equivalent 4. Let E C R. Prove that the following statements are (a) E is Lebesgue measurable (b) Given e> 0, there exist m* denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set (c) Given e 0, there exist a closed set F such that F C E and m* (E- F) < E. (d) There exists a set G (a countable intersection of open sets) such that E C G and m* (G - E) 0 (e) There exists a set...
equivalent 4. Let E C R. Prove that the following statements are (a) E is Lebesgue measurable (b) Given e> 0, there exist m* denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set (c) Given e 0, there exist a closed set F such that F C E and m* (E- F) < E. (d) There exists a set G (a countable intersection of open sets) such that E C G and m* (G - E) 0 (e) There exists a set...
equivalent 4. Let E C R. Prove that the following statements are (a) E is Lebesgue measurable (b) Given e> 0, there exist m* denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set (c) Given e 0, there exist a closed set F such that F C E and m* (E- F) < E. (d) There exists a set G (a countable intersection of open sets) such that E C G and m* (G - E) 0 (e) There exists a set...
(a) Let Ω = [4, 101 and let A = 16, 6], [8, 10]} 2. (i) Find F(A) (ii) Let X : 2->R be defined by X = 2-1[4,5]-3 . 1 (6,8) Is X, F(A)-measurable? Justify your answer. (b) Let (2, F) be a measurable space, and let X :2-R. Suppose that X+ is F-measurable. Does this imply that X is F-measurable? Either prove it or give a counterexample.
(a) Let Ω = [4, 101 and let A = 16,...
(11) Let (,A. /) be a measure space. Let g 2 - R* be a measurable function which is integrable on a set A E A. Let f, : O -> R* be a sequence of measurable functions such that g(x) < fn(x) < fn+1(x), for all E A and n E N. Prove that lim fn d lim fn du noo A
(11) Let (,A. /) be a measure space. Let g 2 - R* be a measurable function...
(3) Let (2,A, /i) be a measure space. Let f : N > R* be a nonnegative measurable function. Define the sequence fn(x) = min{f(x), n}, n E N. Prove that for any A E A f du lim fn du A 4 (You must show that the integrals exist.)
(3) Let (2,A, /i) be a measure space. Let f : N > R* be a nonnegative measurable function. Define the sequence fn(x) = min{f(x), n}, n E N. Prove...
(5) Let (. A, /u) be a measure space. Let f,g : O > R* be a pair functions. Assume that f is measurable and that f = g almost everywhere. (a) Prove that q is measurable on A. Prove that g is integrable (b) Let A E A and assume that f is integrable on A and A
(5) Let (. A, /u) be a measure space. Let f,g : O > R* be a pair functions. Assume that...
(6) Let (2,A, /i) be a measure space. Let fn: N -» R* be a sequence of measurable functions. Let g, h : 2 -> R* be a integrable pair of measurable functions such that both are on a set AE A and g(x) < fn(x) < h(x), for all x E A and n e N. Prove that / / fn du lim sup fn d lim sup lim inf fn d< lim inf fn du п00 n oo...
(6) Let (, A,i) be a measure space. Let fn : 0 -» R* be a sequence of measurable functions. Let g, h : O -> R* be a pair of measurable functions such that both are integrable on a set A E A and g(x) < fn(x)<h(x), for all E A and ne N. Prove that / lim sup fn du fn dulim sup fn du lim inf fn du lim inf n o0 A n-oo A noo n00...