Question

The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of the two treatments, A and B. In this pro...

The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of the two treatments, A and B. In this problem, costs and consequences are not discounted.

Treatment A

Treatment B

Mortality rate

2%

5%

Life expectancy for survivors

30 years

20 years

Initial treatment cost

$20,000

$10,000

Follow up costs, year 1

$5,000

$1,000

Annual follow up costs, all subsequent years

$1,000

$500

  1. Calculate the incremental cost and incremental benefit of the treatment alternatives.

DC =

DE =

  1. What is the ICER?

ICER = DC/DE =

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

DC means the difference in the cost of the two treatments.

So we calculate the cost of treatment A first

Cost = 20000 + 5000 + 1000* 29 (because life expectancy is 30 years)

= 54000

Cost of treatment B = 10000+ 1000 + 500*19

= 20500

DC= 54000 - 20500 = 33500 $

DE stands for difference in effectiveness .

DE = 5-2 = 3

ICER = DC/DE = 33500/3 = 11166.7 $ per percent

So ICER is 11166.7 $ per percent mortality .

So it means treatment A decreases mortality by 1% for 11166.7$ extra cost.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of the two treatments, A and B. In this pro...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of the two treatments, A...

    The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of the two treatments, A and B. In this problem, costs and consequences are not discounted. Treatment A Treatment B Mortality rate 2% 5% Life expectancy for survivors 30 years 20 years Initial treatment cost $20,000 $10,000 Follow up costs, year 1 $5,000 $1,000 Annual follow up costs, all subsequent years $1,000 $500 a. What is the total cost for the survivors receiving treatment A? $54,000 For decedents (assuming...

  • Economic Evaluation problem 1 The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of...

    Economic Evaluation problem 1 The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of the two treatments, A and B. In ths prodle, eSts and consequences are not discounted. Treatment A 2% 20 years $10,000 $5,000 Annual follow up costs, all $1,000 Treatment B Mortality rate Life expectancy for survivors Initial treatment cost 5% 10 years $3,000 Follow up costs, year 1 $1,000 $500 subsequent years 31,O00 11000 b. What is the total cost for survivors receiving treatment...

  • 10. The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of two treatments, A...

    10. The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of two treatments, A and B, where treatment B is an “older” treatment, while A is a “new” treatment. (Note: In this problem, dollar figures do not have to be “discounted.” Also, it might help to sketch out a simple “decision tree,” but it is not required to do so.) Variable Treatment A Treatment B Mortality rate 5% 10% Life expectancy for survivors 20 years 15 years Initial...

  • 12. The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of two treatments, A...

    12. The following information has been gathered on the costs and effectiveness of two treatments, A and B, where treatment B is an “older” treatment, while A is a “new” treatment. Variable Treatment A Treatment B Mortality rate 5% 10% Life expectancy for survivors 20 years 15 years Initial treatment cost $20,000 $5,000 Follow up cost, year one (1) $5,000 $2,000 Annual follow up costs, all subsequent years $2,000 $1,000 What is the expected cost for those patients receiving treatment...

  • 0-810 ECON530-010-201940 The following information has been gathered on the cost costs and consequences are not...

    0-810 ECON530-010-201940 The following information has been gathered on the cost costs and consequences are not discounted s and effectiveness of the two treatments, A and B. In this problem Treatment A Treatment B Mortality rate 5% 2% Life expectancy for survivors 20 years 10 years AInitial treatment cost$10,000 $5,000 $2,000 $500 Follow up costs, year 1$5,000 Annual follow up costs, all $1,000 subsequent years What is the total cost for the decedents receiving treatment A(assuming sudden death)?

  • Consider a $5,000 payment that is to be received exactly three (3) years from now. If...

    Consider a $5,000 payment that is to be received exactly three (3) years from now. If the discount rate is 5%, what is the “present value” of the future $5,000 payment? Group of answer choices a. $4,319.19 b. $4,750.00 c. $4,761.90 d. $5,788.13 A pharmaceutical firm has recently developed a new medication, and is now considering whether or not to market the new medication over the next two years. The firm has decided to use “cost-benefit analysis” to make its...

  • You have the following table of costs and benefits for alternative treatments Treatment # Cost Effectiveness...

    You have the following table of costs and benefits for alternative treatments Treatment # Cost Effectiveness (life years gained) 1 100000 5 2 200000 3 3 400000 10 4 500000 20 A.        Which treatment(s) if any, is strongly dominated? B.        Which treatment(s) if any is weakly dominated? C.        Calculate incremental cost effectiveness ratios. D.        Assuming that a life year is considered to be worth up to 100000, which interventions would you choose, in the absence of budgetary constraints? E.         How might budgetary constraints affect your...

  • Consider two treatments for lung cancer: (1) radiation and chemotherapy and (2) immunotherapy. Treatment 1 costs...

    Consider two treatments for lung cancer: (1) radiation and chemotherapy and (2) immunotherapy. Treatment 1 costs $30,000. Treatment 2 costs $75,000. With treatment 1, there is a 75% chance the patient will be alive in year 1 and a 50% chance in year 2, but the patient will die in year 3. The quality of life is poor with treatment 1, 50% of full health in both years. With treatment 2, there is 50% chance of being alive in year...

  • 2.Cost-effectiveness Analysis Amoria Phlebitis is a fictional illness from The Simpsons that caus...

    2.Cost-effectiveness Analysis Amoria Phlebitis is a fictional illness from The Simpsons that causes sharp stabbing pains to the stomach and arms and temporary loss of vision. A 25-year-old patient diagnosed with this condition has an expected lifespan of 35 more years, during which they will continue to deal with these symptoms. Two new treatments (surgery and medication) have recently been proposed as alternatives to the current solution (no treatment).   Medication prevents the disease from getting worse and will extend the...

  • Please help ASAP. A new treatment has been developed to alleviate the symptoms of Hansen’s disease...

    Please help ASAP. A new treatment has been developed to alleviate the symptoms of Hansen’s disease (once known as Leprosy), which is prevalent on Island Z. The treatment does not eliminate all symptoms but substantially reduces their severity. All of those with the disease had been advised to take a one-time treatment that costs $5,000 (Treatment A). However a new treatment has come on the market. It is also taken one time, but like many drugs with a small market...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT