Question

Compare and contrast the circumstances faced by people with disabilities in the US and in Australia.

1. How does socioeconomic status or the overall economy of the country affect disabled communities?

2. Do people living with disabilities in these countries have equal access compared to their non-disabled counterparts?

Answer 1

1. How does socioeconomic status or the overall economy of the country affect disabled communities?

Disability and Socioeconomic Status:

Financial status (SES) incorporates pay as well as instructive accomplishment, money related security, and abstract view of societal position and social class. Financial status can envelop personal satisfaction traits just as the chances and benefits stood to individuals inside society. Neediness, explicitly, is anything but a solitary factor but instead is portrayed by various physical and psychosocial stressors. Further, SES is a steady and solid indicator of a huge range of results over the life expectancy, including physical and mental wellbeing. Accordingly, SES is important to all domains of conduct and sociology, including research, practice, instruction and backing.

SES Affects Our Society

SES influences in general human working, including our physical and emotional wellness. Low SES and its corresponds, for example, lower instructive accomplishment, destitution, and weakness, eventually influence our general public. Disparities in wellbeing dissemination, asset dispersion and personal satisfaction are expanding in the United States and all around. Society profits by an expanded spotlight on the establishments of financial imbalances and endeavors to lessen the profound holes in financial status in the United States and abroad.

SES Impacts the Lives of People with a Disability

In spite of the fact that the Americans with Disabilities Act guarantees equivalent open doors in instruction and work for individuals with inabilities and disallows segregation based on incapacity, individuals with handicaps remain overrepresented among America's poor and undereducated. As indicated by the U.S. Division of Labor's (2017) Office of Disability Employment Policy, the work power cooperation rate for individuals with inabilities (counting physical, scholarly and formative, tangible, and other handicap classifications) matured 16 and over is 20.1 percent when contrasted with 68.6 percent for individuals without incapacities of a similar age. Inabilities among youngsters and grown-ups may influence the financial remaining of whole families. In 2015, about 38,601,898 individuals in the United States had an Disability ( U.S. Registration Bureau, 2015).

Salary and Poverty for People With a Disability

The government has two significant projects to help people with inabilities. Standardized savings Disability Insurance (SSDI) is a protection program for laborers who have turned out to be handicapped and unfit to work in the wake of making good on Social Security regulatory obligations for in any event 40 quarters. In this program, a higher salary yields higher SSDI income. Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is a customary welfare program for people with low pay, less generally assets, and ordinarily no or a contracted work history. The present government advantage for a solitary individual using SSI is $735 per month. Besides, in numerous states, SSI beneficiaries consequently meet all requirements for Medicaid. In spite of these and different types of help, people with inabilities are bound to be jobless and live in neediness. The American Association of People with Disabilities assesses that 66% of individuals with inabilities are of working age and need to work. The high rate of neediness among people with an incapacity fills questions about the adequacy of open help to these people and motivators to assist individuals with returning to work.

2. Do people living with disabilities in these countries have equal access compared to their non-disabled counterparts?

In the course of the most recent two decades, there has been a change in perspective in the manner in which the general public perspectives people with inabilities. This distinction in approach for example seeing handicap not as an individual pathology however as a social develop not just discovers articulation in the lawful instruments that have been sanctioned for their social, monetary and instructive progression, yet additionally, more significantly, in the activities that administrations and private associations – schools, colleges, managers – have taken for enabling them to contend on a balance of uniformity with their non-crippled partners. In many nations, people with incapacities are never again treated as simple objects of philanthropy and compassion; rather, they are seen as equivalent individuals from society who might be extraordinary, however are no less able or equipped than their partners. A few models can be refered to represent this point – from T. V. Raman, an Indian-brought into the world visually impaired PC researcher who is presently seen as one of the most compelling individuals at Google to Stevie Wonder, one of the most renowned performers and vocalists on the planet who is visually impaired; from Stephen Hawking, the world-celebrated physicist and mathematician to Lenin Moreno, a well known lawmaker who was debilitated in a shooting before turning into the Vice President of Ecuador in 2007. In most dynamic legitimate instruments, the meaning of incapacity doesn't stress the irregularity or confinement that people with inabilities face; rather, it centers around declaring the basic humanness of each person and on survey debilitated people as an impression of human decent variety and afterward recognizes the extraordinary qualities that recognize them from different individuals in the general public. Against this scenery, this article looks to break down the viability of laws ordering access to open spots to people with incapacities in India. It examines the difficulties that people with handicaps still keep on looking in getting to changed conditions and talks about some potential arrangements.

The manner by which people with inabilities are treated in India is in consonance with the meaning of handicap propounded by the British Council which is as per the following: "incapacity is the disservice or confinement of movement brought about by a general public which takes practically no record of individuals who have impedances and along these lines rejects them from standard exercises." It is terrifying to take note of that, despite the fact that India professes to perceive Disability as a component of a bigger territory of human decent variety, not many substantive measures have been taken to introduce by right or accepted equity with regards to people with incapacities. The powerlessness to make a domain that encourages all inclusive access and the articulate dismissal to the exceptional needs of the handicapped has been the fundamental driver for the debilitation of the crippled in India. While this can to a great extent be ascribed to the lazy methodology of policymakers in attempted persevering and compelling activities for advancing the privileges of the crippled in India, it can likewise be credited to the way that an enormous number of people with handicaps still view themselves as aloof beneficiaries of care and compassion as opposed to getting to be dynamic specialists of progress. The forces that be in India would do well to recall the expressions of Marcia H. Roux: "Individuals with handicaps give us a way to comprehend the manner by which public activity can be sorted out to be reasonable, to be simply, to be helpful, to be equivalent. They give us a chance to go past finding the underlying foundations of philanthropy and to search rather for the underlying foundations of equity. Balance and non-separation, which are the very nuts and bolts of human rights law, can be brought into clear spotlight by thinking about the spot of individuals with incapacities in our social orders."